10-15-2022, 03:03 PM | #1 |
this is the way
20007
Rep 8,949
Posts |
PS: Front bumper design tweaks
Was screwing around with PS and decided to make the bottom intakes a little bit wider and not as bulky. Also added body color to the bottom center of the bumper. Definitely like the wider intakes, it's more elegant looking and more closely matches the rear bumper design without taking anything away from the boxy theme. I'm indifferent on the body colored center though.
What do you think? |
10-15-2022, 03:06 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant Colonel
3438
Rep 1,748
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2022, 12:42 PM | #9 | |
Moderator
32978
Rep 13,409
Posts |
Quote:
IMHO /===\ improves the front end design-wise. And indeed 'close' the underside of the lower central air intake. To catch my drift: see https://f87.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...9#post23156349 ("M front bumper design evolution from Z3 M Roadster to M2 Competition")
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
|
Appreciate
1
JTO245803.00 |
10-16-2022, 01:30 PM | #11 | |
this is the way
20007
Rep 8,949
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2022, 01:49 PM | #12 |
Moderator
32978
Rep 13,409
Posts |
That's an easy fix for BMW M for the LCI, if willing.
Fitting the M Performance Parts splitter in the meantime ? Yeah, especially on BSM, but it features rather questionable vertical winglets:
__________________
///M is art ↔ Artemis
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2022, 02:04 PM | #13 |
this is the way
20007
Rep 8,949
Posts |
If I wanted to look like an anoosehole I'd get the M Performance parts. I prefer to avoid being one.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2022, 10:57 PM | #14 |
Colonel
2148
Rep 2,290
Posts |
I have NO idea why they didn’t choose to finish the bottom center lip in body-color paint. It looks pretty unfinished. These pictures look great.
__________________
///M
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-17-2022, 03:07 AM | #16 | ||
this is the way
20007
Rep 8,949
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
3
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|