Today, 12:24 AM | #3433 |
Remove Before Flight
8101
Rep 1,655
Posts |
My initial read is that the Army H-60 (PAT25) may have made an error as to what traffic they called in sight. It looks to me like the AA RJ (AA5342, a CRJ-700) doing everything right and got hit by the Blackhawk as they were rolled wing-up towards Final on 33.
Audio between PAT25 and DCA tower asks if they have the CRJ in sight. PAT25 affirms and requests visual separation. AA3130 was on final to 01 at the time. PAT25 may have called that traffic in sight, thinking it was the AA5432-- and missed AA5432 being wing-high to them. Just my 0.02. R.
__________________
Current: F87 M2C, Miata RF-GT, RDX & Element // R1200GS & VRSCF
Previous: E46 M3, Focus ZX3-S2, Superchaged Solara, Samurai, Integra, Pinto & RX-4 // VRSCR, R6S, FZ1 & FZ600 |
Appreciate
6
|
Today, 05:06 AM | #3434 |
Captain
23084
Rep 773
Posts |
Tragic news out of DCA.
There are two USAF fighter wings in Korea. Up North at Osan Air Base -- about an hour South of Seoul -- is the 51st which has a single squadron of F-16C Vipers and another of A-10C Warthogs -- the latter not long for this world. Down South, at Kunsan Air Base, is the 8th FW "Wolfpack" with two squadrons of F-16Cs. Here is a photo of a painted-up Viper of the Wolfpack.
__________________
'25 M850ix GC
BMW CCA 30 years Last edited by Llarry; Today at 12:44 PM.. |
Today, 05:40 AM | #3436 | |
Captain
23084
Rep 773
Posts |
Quote:
In return, let me present a few historical photos of aircraft flown by Fighter Squadron 154 over the years... Before the F-18, 154 flew the F-14A Tomcat Before the F-14A, they flew several different models of the F-4 Phantom Before the F-4, they flew the F-8 Crusader. Before the F-8, they flew the FJ-3 Fury (not pictured) Before the FJ-3, they flew the F9F Panther When activated in the Korean War era, they first flew the F4U Corsair
__________________
'25 M850ix GC
BMW CCA 30 years Last edited by Llarry; Today at 11:50 AM.. |
|
Today, 07:18 AM | #3437 |
Cailín gan eagla.
85723
Rep 1,063
Posts |
I just watched the video showing the Blackhawk running into American Flt. 5342 after the ATC asked them if they had the landing airplane in sight.
Not a good day... https://en.as.com/latest_news/americ...ent-history-n/ Last edited by Lady Jane; Today at 07:30 AM.. Reason: Added info. |
Appreciate
1
vreihen1622815.00 |
Today, 09:43 AM | #3438 |
Major General
11175
Rep 9,155
Posts |
Terrible news, i've flown in and out of that airport for years when I lived in DC...
I have to wonder why these flight paths are this close to each other and why you would ever allow helis to pass in a landing flight path... i don't know whats going but the FAA seems like a total mess and the recent explanation of the drone sighting being an faa approved test where even weirder... so perhaps there are serious procedural or communication issues somewhere.
__________________
2 x N54 -> 1 x N55 -> 1 x S55-> 1 x B58
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 12:38 PM | #3439 | |
Brigadier General
4577
Rep 3,406
Posts |
Quote:
I am a total novice when it comes to aviation, but I agree with you. Again, I'm no aviation expert but from what I'm seeing it looks like we had a blackhawk heli with no TCAS basically playing frogger in commercial airspace. Doesn't seem like a good idea, but I'm sure there's more to this story. Last edited by Chihuahua; Today at 12:47 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
1
ASAP11174.50 |
Today, 02:09 PM | #3440 |
Recovering Perfectionist
22815
Rep 1,037
Posts |
...with all three Blackhawk crew members wearing night vision goggles as part of a training exercise from what the TV news talking heads are reporting.....
__________________
Currently BMW-less.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 02:49 PM | #3441 |
Brigadier General
4577
Rep 3,406
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Today, 03:04 PM | #3442 |
Private First Class
2002
Rep 247
Posts |
I want to say condolences but it won't help the issue at all...
And not sure if this is related to the FAA director being recently fired and ATC hiring freeze.. I've got so many images of these kinds of incidents in my head, terrible 2025 continuing.. |
Appreciate
1
Esteban58353.00 |
Today, 03:05 PM | #3443 |
Free Thinker
20049
Rep 7,561
Posts |
That area is awash with "No Overfly" zones. The Pentagon is right there, for instance. So there are just a few corridors for aircraft to traverse the area. When you funnel so much air traffic into a small space, there is a potential for disaster.
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
Blindside_1377180.50 |
Today, 03:54 PM | #3444 |
Major General
58353
Rep 7,241
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
wizardofOz2002.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|