09-08-2022, 08:28 AM | #23 | |
Post Advisor
1890
Rep 1,824
Posts |
Quote:
I guess the question then will be do we need twice the detergents as regular especially if it is already top tier gas. Furthermore, adding fuel treatment cleaner, which is recommended once every 3,000 miles at the cost of $10 maximum, would be far more economical than filling with premium just for the detergent difference. It usually costs at least $10 more to fill up with premium on every refill. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2022, 09:06 AM | #24 | |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 461
Posts |
Quote:
My general recommendation is to use Top Tier fuel with the appropriate octane for your vehicle. If you frequent cheap, unbranded stations to save pennies then use an aftermarket additive bottle or run 1-2 tanks of Shell/Exxon premium every ~5 tanks. |
|
09-08-2022, 09:31 AM | #25 | |
Post Advisor
1890
Rep 1,824
Posts |
Quote:
By the way, I have no idea what the situation is in other countries. This Is US specific. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2022, 10:03 AM | #26 |
Infinite Boulder Roller
601
Rep 411
Posts |
^^ Brings to mind the question. Our COSTCO advertises on the pump that they are selling Top Tier gasoline. Does anyone have any knowledge to the contrary?
I love saving the $$ at the pump, but I can also shop at kroger and buy gas at Shell... and be close in price with the discount. It feels like the shell stations around here have a higher chance of being shady than COSTCO. ?? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2022, 10:11 AM | #27 | |
First Lieutenant
188
Rep 338
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-08-2022, 10:17 AM | #28 | |
Infinite Boulder Roller
601
Rep 411
Posts |
Quote:
To the OP - just use 91/93. Drive with a soft foot if the $$ hurts - these cars SIP gas for what they are. Also - checked Top Tier's website - retailers must sell Top Tier fuel for all grades at all locations to be "certified". Costco is certified. so.. Maybe look into getting a Costco membership if you have one close. It does help |
|
Appreciate
1
Kromans1187.50 |
09-09-2022, 09:24 AM | #31 |
Colonel
1857
Rep 2,760
Posts |
I cannot speak to the true "M"'s as I have the G29 M40. I will say the next time you stop at the pump, take a look at the sticker for the minimum octane rating. That is your guide. I will say the comparison I observed from 89 v 93, is not appreciable in normal everyday driving.
|
Appreciate
1
Kromans1187.50 |
09-09-2022, 12:46 PM | #32 | |
Post Advisor
1890
Rep 1,824
Posts |
Quote:
Some may say it's only a few hundred dollars at the end of the year. They would be correct. But if you have a few hundred dollars that you don't care about, I have a zelle/paypal account you can send it to . If you stick with top tier like Costco and you fill up regular and you are not tracking your car, you will be just fine. No engine damage, no harmful contaminants, etc. |
|
09-09-2022, 12:48 PM | #33 |
Post Advisor
1890
Rep 1,824
Posts |
Bingo. I have noticed at time, in certain weather, that their is a 1mpg difference, which amounts to about 4% difference. So if premium costs 4% more than regular, you are burning money (again, assuming top tier gas).
|
09-09-2022, 03:21 PM | #34 | |
Colonel
2364
Rep 2,407
Posts
Drives: G87 M2; E92M3 MT&DCT; M3 euro
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: nyc
|
Knocking has to happen first for the knock sensors to detect and stop the car from doing so. Such repetition will eventually score your pistons and the cylinder. Regular will cause knock for most 6 cylinders and up. You also have to keep rpm & load down on regular, which causes more frustration. There's a reason why minimum AKI is stated as "emergency only" grade and should not be driven over a certain speed (i.e. engine load) or engine speed.
For us M owners, few hundred difference isn't big enough to risk expensive engine and fuel system related failure. The car just runs so much more efficient on 93 AKI. Quote:
__________________
Pass me if you can.
|
|
09-09-2022, 05:31 PM | #35 | |
Chief
69
Rep 39
Posts |
Quote:
I don’t think the OP was going to use low-octane gas. he was just wondering what would happen and why. It's a reasonable question. |
|
Appreciate
1
Kromans1187.50 |
09-09-2022, 06:22 PM | #36 | |
Post Advisor
1890
Rep 1,824
Posts |
Quote:
I don't know what the gas situation in Japan so your results may be quite different than mine. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2022, 09:12 AM | #37 | |
Brigadier General
3002
Rep 4,210
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-11-2022, 11:25 PM | #38 | |
Darth ZEDer
7277
Rep 1,500
Posts
Drives: 2022 BMW Z4 sDrive3.0
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: metro St Louis
|
Quote:
Many believe premium fuel has more or better additives than regular. NOT TRUE! There may be some rare exceptions for boutique premium blends but regulations ensure all fuel sold in the US has a minimum amount of additives. In most cases regular gas has the same amount as premium in a particular brand. Another specification (not regulation) is "Top Tier". "The additive companies create additive formulations and conduct testing, ultimately receiving TOP TIER™ approval. The fuel retailer licensee agrees to purchase fuel treated with a TOP TIER™ additive at the correct concentration and display the logo." Read more at https://toptiergas.com/. Most major vehicle manufacturers recommend (but don't require) Top Tier fuel. So… if most fuel brands include the same additives in all of their fuel, what is the difference between regular, mid grade, and premium? OCTANE Contrary to popular belief, premium is not more powerful than regular gas. Premium is formulated to reduce pre combustion ((when the fuel combusts before it's supposed to (it's suppose to combust when the spark plug fires)). The octane number is the measurement of the fuel's tendency to precombust. The lower the number, the easier it is to combust (at lower temperatures and/or compression levels). Recommended octane levels vary by vehicle. On my G29 Z4, minimum is 89 and recommended is 91. What happens if I use regular (87 octane)? I'm likely to get more precombustion (synonymous with preignition), especially at higher temperatures and under greater load (accelerating or going uphill for example). Over time, excessive pre combustion can cause damage and/or premature wear to the engine components (precombustion generates forces against the piston before it's reached the top of its stroke), decreasing engine longevity. Most or all modern vehicles have technology that can identify precombustion. They differ in how well they handle it. Many will adjust the ignition timing (and perhaps air/fuel ratios) to effectively compensate, resulting in reduced engine performance but minimizing any damage to the engine. Some vehicles don't manage it as well as others. I can't tell you specifically how BMW vehicles manage it because it's proprietary information. Bottom line: Try to use the minimum octane recommended by the manufacturer (in the manual and near your gas cap). If on rare occasion you only have access to regular 87 octane gas, it'll be perfectly fine to use it as long as you don't put the engine under heavy load (high temperatures, towing, long uphill climbs, etc.) Fill it up with the recommended octane at the next opportunity. |
|
Appreciate
3
|
09-12-2022, 08:32 AM | #39 | |
First Lieutenant
188
Rep 338
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
StanDiego7277.00 |
09-12-2022, 11:44 AM | #40 | |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 461
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
09-12-2022, 01:01 PM | #41 | |
Darth ZEDer
7277
Rep 1,500
Posts
Drives: 2022 BMW Z4 sDrive3.0
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: metro St Louis
|
Quote:
COSTCO claims "Kirkland Signature™ Gasoline contains five times the EPA detergent requirement in both regular unleaded and premium grades". Summary: I have always recommended Top Tier gasoline as do most vehicle manufacturers and industry experts. However, I am unable to find a single industry expert (other than perhaps the fuel manufacturers themselves) who recommends using a higher octane gasoline than what is recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. The vast majority of industry experts claim it is a waste of money to do so and I agree. |
|
Appreciate
1
Kromans1187.50 |
09-13-2022, 06:26 AM | #42 |
Lieutenant
647
Rep 399
Posts |
Throwing my ring in the hat here. I love the discussion. With that said, this discussion is somewhat useless. While we can debate whether or not it is worth it or not to use a higher or lower octane rating than a low amount from a purely technical perspective, it may not matter.
I agree with whoever said to always put atleast the minimum listed in, if for nothing else due to potential warranty implications. I don’t think anyone can prove or disprove with 100% certainty what BMW will do if there is an issue with say the engine or anything fuel related and they see a lower octane rating than the minimum stated in the vehicle. Likely, they wouldn’t care or notice, but if they do, well? In addition, where I live in the US, often times (Wawa, Sheetz, and Sunoco to name a few) don’t have a 91 rating. Instead they jump from 89 straight to 92 or 93 octane as the highest. In which case, on my 2011 328i 6 cyl, the minimum per the gas port is 91. Could it do 89? I’m sure I can, do I want to chance it on an expensive vehicle? While I often just put whatever the highest is in to be safe, that is not what you have to do. With that said, I trust BMW’s rationale for putting minimum 91 on the car as opposed to this thread. There must be a reason, even if its only for a few extra performance ticks and 1 MPG. At the end of the day, these vehicles are not cheap. New or old, BMW parts aren’t cheap. You know that going into buying it. These are cars you have to maintain well, and are expensive when you do, and even more expensive when you neglect them. If you can’t afford higher ratings of octane, you have the wrong car, because you definately won’t be able to afford the BMW parts you eventually will need simply through wear and tear. You want a gas economical car, you are buying the wrong brand. BMW is fuel efficient, but there are even better options out there. Nothing wrong with that, but if fuel efficiency and maximum car savings is your objective, you should be worrying less about octane and more about the vehicle you have. My personal opinion, on how expensive these cars are, why risk even any damage at all from a lower octane rating than minimum? Minimizing damage with modern sensors is not the same thing as preventing damage. It could still wear the engine down, especially over time. TLDR; Just put atleast the minimum in iit says to, ideally recommended if it says. If you don’t like that, don’t buy the car and buy another car that doesn’t say that. There are plenty of great cars out there. I’m sure you can find something you like that has a lower minimum rating. Last edited by TheMaxXHD; 09-13-2022 at 06:49 AM.. |
Appreciate
1
Kromans1187.50 |
09-13-2022, 08:09 AM | #43 | |
Lieutenant
249
Rep 461
Posts |
Quote:
Using a higher octane rating than recommended is a waste of money, yes. This is very well known. Engine controls are so sophisticated these days that they will adjust to preserve the engine despite whatever fuel you put in, to a degree. Some manufacturers now even give power ratings based on fuel octane used, see the new Ford Bronco 2.3L and 2.7L specs. My comments are mostly around additives and their treat rates. I'm constantly amazed at how people have strong opinions with little to no actual knowledge or data. Additives are not snake oil, there is an entire industry for fuel additives and the EPA has a minimum amount required because they work to reduce deposits. Additives do make a significant difference in performance and there are millions of dollars spent by many companies to generate data to support their marketing claims. |
|
Appreciate
4
|
09-13-2022, 08:15 AM | #44 | ||
BMW Owner Since 1971
2556
Rep 1,557
Posts
Drives: 1964 700 Sport Cabriolet
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Virginia
|
So how do you convert octane recommendations on your gas flap to the formula for octane ratings on the pump? Aren't they totally different systems of measurement/equations?
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by BMWCCA1; 09-13-2022 at 08:17 PM.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|