[KingOfJericho]

Totally different beast but a beast nonetheless.

[Lifted07Duramax]

I noticed an M6 is well below $40k but gets way worse gas mileage and probably wouldnt have any warranty on it from having to be a few years old just to get one in the high $30k range.

Id love to have a newer 650i but they are still too much for me.

[NemesisX]

It looks hideous but I'd still buy one. 556 HP stock is pretty enticing.

If the car looked better I'd get one in a heartbeat. The only thing holding me back is the aesthetics. It still looks like a car fit for an 80 year old. The coupe looks more amenable to a younger crowd but it's still downright hideous.

[NemesisX]

Originally Posted by Lifted07Duramax

Really 3600lbs? Any plants for a atsv coupe? If so probably not anytime soon huh

Id be all over that TT 3.6 I bet it could hit 500rwhp with the same mods as the 335i takes to reach 450rwhp

Anyone take an ISF over a CTSV?

No.

CTSV = C63 AMG (BS?) > M3 > ISF

I wouldn't even take an M3 over a CTSV. Why would I take an ISF? The ISF is at the bottom of the totem pole for cars in its class.

I might actually put the C63 AMG above the CTSV because of aesthetics, price be damned.

But from a value standpoint, the CTSV is great.

[Lifted07Duramax]

I agree the C63 looks much better but for some reason I do like the looks of the CTSV it doesnt look like your bmw, audi, MB but it does have a sporty look to it IMO

[buildbright]

Originally Posted by NemesisX

No.

CTSV = C63 AMG (BS?) > M3 > ISF

I wouldn't even take an M3 over a CTSV. Why would I take an ISF? The ISF is at the bottom of the totem pole for cars in its class.

I might actually put the C63 AMG above the CTSV because of aesthetics, price be damned.

But from a value standpoint, the CTSV is great.

CTS-V is not comparable to those other cars except in price. It's more of a cheap priced M5. M3 is a drivers car. The C63 is a German muscle car. ISF is confused.