bimmerpost/
BMW M2 and 2-Series Coupe
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
home
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-20-2010, 11:10 AM   #1
TonyMeister
Second Lieutenant
109
Rep
204
Posts

Drives: Not a BMW...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm here I'm there I'm F' everywhere I'm the eggman

iTrader: (0)

Insideline: Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG track video

This Insideline website tends to achieve very slow acceleration times, I'm pretty sure the car is way quicker than just 4.8 seconds. However, the sound of that V8 is amazing and so is the speed it went through the slalom.

Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 11:42 AM   #2
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4458
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Over 4,400 pounds, that's just sad. Of course it will probably be even faster when it gets the 5.5l tt motor. My mom's had a few SL's and frankly, I've never understood why anyone would buy an SL over the competition, they're terribly boring to drive.
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 02:54 PM   #3
stickypaws
Dictator
stickypaws's Avatar
55
Rep
1,811
Posts

Drives: people crazy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: where you want to be

iTrader: (0)

Don't forget that Mercedes AMG are always comfort/luxury cars first and performance cars second. If you buy one for performance only you're buying the wrong car. If you want comfort/luxury but with good performance, then they are an excellent choice.
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 03:01 PM   #4
Year's_End
Lieutenant General
Year's_End's Avatar
United_States
1234
Rep
12,446
Posts

Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMeister View Post
This Insideline website tends to achieve very slow acceleration times, I'm pretty sure the car is way quicker than just 4.8 seconds.
No, I disagree. Insideline posts accurate representations of acceleration times. You only think they're slow compared to the rest of the US journalist recordings because they don't post rollout numbers to 60. A legit 0-60 of 4.8s sounds just right for a fat, 4,400 lb convertible, and they say that with rollout it comes down to 4.5s.

They managed multiple 335i runs that came around 5s 0-60 and 4.8s rollout to 60, right where most other recordings have landed.

I give Insideline more credit than most other publishers.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT
Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 03:02 PM   #5
Year's_End
Lieutenant General
Year's_End's Avatar
United_States
1234
Rep
12,446
Posts

Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Do you guys think the SL's curb weight is news? It's been around forever. It's always been heavy. Just because it's had a facelift recently doesn't mean it's lost a couple hundred pounds. It's always been a fat GT.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT
Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 03:46 PM   #6
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4458
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

I guess I just didn't realize they'd gotten quite that fat. I realize a folding hardtop, a 6.2l V8 and all the fluff can't be light, just didn't realize they were two metric tonnes.
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 03:56 PM   #7
Garduna
Brigadier General
Garduna's Avatar
Canada
165
Rep
4,013
Posts

Drives: Sedona 1er|Yellow S3|NardoTTRS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (5)

Looks good and sounds nice
Appreciate 0
      10-20-2010, 11:02 PM   #8
Boost Gomez
Colonel
Boost Gomez's Avatar
No_Country
53
Rep
2,359
Posts

Drives: C63 AMG
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 BMW 335i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
I guess I just didn't realize they'd gotten quite that fat. I realize a folding hardtop, a 6.2l V8 and all the fluff can't be light, just didn't realize they were two metric tonnes.
The 6.2L V8 isn't all that heavy relative to other performance engines. I think it's really the folding hardtop and the structural rigidity necessitated by it that really makes the weight add up.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-21-2010, 12:29 AM   #9
stickypaws
Dictator
stickypaws's Avatar
55
Rep
1,811
Posts

Drives: people crazy
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: where you want to be

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boost Gomez View Post
The 6.2L V8 isn't all that heavy relative to other performance engines. I think it's really the folding hardtop and the structural rigidity necessitated by it that really makes the weight add up.
+1. A convertible (with all that added weight used to beef up the frame) doesn't make a lot of sense if one is buying a car strictly for performance reasons.

But people should remember that for an everyday real world street car, that extra weight comes in handy when a SUV rams into you.....
Appreciate 0
      10-21-2010, 12:48 AM   #10
sb335is
Captain
92
Rep
736
Posts

Drives: fast
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

rather have a c63 or e55
__________________
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 PM.




g87
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST