08-04-2011, 08:43 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
92
Rep 324
Posts |
Is direct injection inherently unreliable?
I know it achieves better MPGs and a lot of automakers are moving towards it but will it cause a lot more cars to break down?
|
08-05-2011, 05:35 PM | #2 |
Savoir Faire
83
Rep 1,772
Posts |
FSI V8s in general have problems with carbon build up in the valves. My RS4 had its valves cleaned once. Found a fair amount of debris and deposits in there. Not sure about other manufacturers
__________________
Current: Alpine White F10 M5|H&R springs|12mm/10mm spacers|Eisenmann Race
Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3|MTM 10mm spacers|Hotchkis rear sway bar|APR Stage 1|Milltek Catless|RNS-E|Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel Sold:E46 323i |
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2011, 05:38 PM | #3 | |
Brigadier General
425
Rep 3,287
Posts |
Quote:
As far as in general across brands, no idea.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2011, 08:19 PM | #5 |
Dictator
55
Rep 1,811
Posts |
DFI is not "inherently unreliable."
Oil in the PCV system is the problem with certain DFI motor designs. And first generations did not include effective oil separators. A properly designed oil separator will keep coking issues at bay (like Porsche and Mercedes are now doing.) DFI design and technology gets more advanced every year, and it's here to stay. There are a lot of advantages to a properly designed DFI motor; much more energy efficient with increased performance, and it can also run lean. Again, there's a lot of R+D going into DFI and it is not going to be "inherently unreliable." Certainly no more so than a NA motor versus a modern FI motor (will there be any NA motors left soon?) These concerns also came up when carburetors started to go the way of electronic fuel injection. The argument was that EFI was never going to be as reliable as an old fashioned carburetor. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|