06-09-2016, 07:01 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
11849
Rep 4,873
Posts |
Another Novel Idea from Tesla
NDAs to prevent owners from disclosing repairs of potential defects in exchange for covering the cost of the repair:
http://money.cnn.com/2016/06/09/auto...aws/index.html http://dailykanban.com/2016/06/tesla...crime-coverup/
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82 |
06-10-2016, 10:52 AM | #3 |
Colonel
1760
Rep 2,942
Posts |
It's also illegal for purchased cars. If you own the property, the manufacturer of said property can't compel you to not discuss that property with outside agencies -- the NTHSA or otherwise.
The FTC also has very clear guidelines regarding this for new and dealer-sold used cars that relate to the Lemon Law and As-Is/Warranty disclosure -- particularly as it relates to used sales. (And before Tesla fanboys speak up about Tesla not having dealers -- by the letter of these laws, they do.) To get around that particular rule, Tesla would have to forbid its cars from being sold used by any sort of dealership -- which it can't do because the property is no longer owned or controlled by Tesla because it's been purchased. It would theoretically become a cycle that would ultimately kill the market for used Teslas, both in terms of resale and repair.
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.-- <<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>> |
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 06:04 PM | #4 |
Banned
438
Rep 1,602
Posts |
So basically they are saying if they Goodwill a repair (IE - repair for free for something out of warranty) they are asking you to not disclose this repair with the public.
If it was a warranty repair, that's one thing. A Goodwill free repair is a totally different subject. You are not compelled to do anything; if you want a free repair not owed to you, you have to pony up and sign the document. Otherwise, pay for the repair and blab away. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 07:07 PM | #5 | |
Private
7
Rep 55
Posts |
Quote:
Seems fair to me. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-10-2016, 07:16 PM | #6 | |
Brigadier General
11849
Rep 4,873
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 02:36 AM | #7 |
2JZ-GTE
3166
Rep 4,142
Posts |
Telsa, at it again. I like the fact they pay their electricians about $5 an hour at the factory.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 08:32 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant
347
Rep 443
Posts |
To put both sides of the story out there:
https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/grain-of-salt |
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 08:53 AM | #9 | |
Brigadier General
11849
Rep 4,873
Posts |
Quote:
However, their explanation of why they require an agreement to be signed with NDA terms makes little sense, if any at all. If there are damages aside from the repair costs (e.g. physical injuries) caused by the part or damage being repaired, no way the customer agrees to those terms. If there are no other damages, there is no basis for further claim if the they cover the repair costs - so no need for the agreement. They also don't need to mention any specific party such as the NHSTA since it as a blanket NDA so that point from Tesla is moot. Given their closely manicured image and PR emphasis, I believe these agreements are designed to prevent customers from talking about quality issues they have with Tesla. As Tesla stated in that blog post they own all the service centers so they know everything that has been repaired. Well, the flip side of that is they also control all information about repairs, particularly if customers need to sign agreements that keep them quiet. There is no independent dealer network that can report to NHTSA or contribute to industry statistics. We only know what Tesla wants us to know.
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-11-2016, 11:45 PM | #11 |
*May contain nuts
195
Rep 286
Posts |
This concept of "failing to proceed" has been around as long as automobiles.
Most famously around the Rolls Royce brand > http://www.snopes.com/autos/dream/rolls.asp |
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2016, 06:45 PM | #12 |
Go Spurs Go
3985
Rep 2,916
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-30-2016, 07:22 PM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
11849
Rep 4,873
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2016, 07:37 PM | #14 | |
Brigadier General
3197
Rep 3,640
Posts |
Quote:
Your snide mention of this story would have some value if Autopilot malfunctioned or the accident could have been prevented by a human. Neither were the case. This was just a shitty situation, but the headline provides some good click bait. I wonder if they asked the decapitated driver's family to sign an NDA? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2016, 07:53 PM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
11849
Rep 4,873
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2018 SO/SS F83 ZCP
Gone: 2015 SO/SO F82 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2016, 07:59 PM | #16 | |
Go Spurs Go
3985
Rep 2,916
Posts |
Quote:
He apparently thinks I somehow had a gf and she was banged in a Tesla Apparently posting info about an incident makes me a hater I'll make sure not to post anything about BMW crashes or Honda failed airbags , in case my gf also was banged on those as well... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2016, 11:19 AM | #19 |
General
19137
Rep 19,698
Posts |
When an app fails on your smartphone, you say shit!, and download a new app. When an app fails in a Tesla... you pretty much die.
Cars are not cell phones, no matter how big the infotainment screen is. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|