[supra93]

Originally Posted by Red Bread

Let's hope the BMW looks better. Way to porky and lumpy for my eyes.

I think its the angle of the render. Here is a side profile spy shot.

[Red Bread]

Better, but still looks bulky and the SLR already had that awful phallic beak. Hopefully they don't use that.

[supra93]

Originally Posted by Satan'sChariot

What is the new Supra supposed to cost? Probably another car that most people cannot afford. Smh

Older article, but they hinted at a price tag.

Nonetheless, the starting point for the FT-1 was a theoretical car with a real-world price tag between $50,000 and $60,000, said Kevin Hunter, president of the Calty Design Research studio in Newport Beach, Calif., where the car was designed.

http://www.autonews.com/article/2014...ure-sports-car

[supra93]

Tried to clean up their rendering a little.

[jpnh]

Am I the only one that has trouble with the freakin' beak on that car?

[trustbran]

Yah that beak is not appealing to me either.....

[supra93]

Added a rear side brake duct vent.

[jpnh]

That beak and how it runs into the hood and "fenders" is very awkward.....its worse than that....butt ugly comes to mind

The rest looks quite good....butterface.....

[DieGrüneHölle]

Originally Posted by Satan'sChariot

$65k I'm buying a C7 Vette over a new Supra. That's just me. I doubt the new Supra will be able to best the C7Z or GS in performance.

Exactly, $65k is too much. It is a Toyota. New Grand Sport all day for that money. Plus dealers will be marking up the V8 Supra, while you can get a Grand Sport well under msrp. I don't see the Supra coming close to C7 GS performance levels.

[supra93]

I think a TT V6 is more likely.