12-31-2022, 03:42 AM | #1 |
New Member
1
Rep 8
Posts |
Rated vs Actual HP / Torque
I took delivery of my M240I about three weeks ago and have kept my speed and RPMs to a "reasonable" level during the break in period.
The B58 engine is rated at 384 HP and 369 Torque, but has anyone actually dynoed their car to verify the actual numbers? |
12-31-2022, 04:49 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant
808
Rep 519
Posts |
G20 M340i's have been dynoing around 410/400 hp/tq so I'd imagine M240i's would be around the same.
__________________
2017 Chevrolet Corvette
2023 BMW M240i xDrive |
Appreciate
0
|
12-31-2022, 02:21 PM | #4 | |
Second Lieutenant
235
Rep 230
Posts |
What you
Quote:
Hap |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-01-2023, 08:38 PM | #6 | |
Colonel
1981
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Quote:
I realize that BMW underestimates power in specifications. My thought was maybe they used the wheel hp of 382 as the specification hp (crank hp) on paper, meaning it's really a 410-420 hp motor at the crank. It definitely feels faster than 382 crank/~340 wheel. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 01:56 AM | #7 |
Private First Class
123
Rep 179
Posts |
Autoid has a video on YouTube of there car making 406hp at the wheels on a Dyno and they have opf filters in the uk to where us models don’t, so us models should be a couple hp more,but take in consideration every Dyno is different but it’s safe to say we have about 400hp to the wheels which makes it roughly 450-460 at the crank
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 03:38 AM | #8 | |
Second Lieutenant
189
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 03:48 AM | #9 | |
Private First Class
128
Rep 134
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2023 G42 M240i, w/ ZTK
Past: 2016 F22 M235xi |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 01:28 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1710
Rep 1,620
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 02:05 PM | #11 |
Captain
746
Rep 706
Posts |
All official carmaker engine power determinations are measured at the engine output shaft - on an engine dyno. Not on a chassis dyno. There have been dozens of different engineering standards for doing this.
BRAKE HORSEPOWER. Back in muscle car days, people talked about BHP - or brake horsepower. That was the SAE standard for gross power at the time. Basically it tested the engine without the ancillaries - like the alternator, radiator fan and water pump. Sometimes they used headers instead of the stock exhaust manifolds. BHP went away in the early 1970s and was replaced by SAE standard J1349 - which measured net power by including all of the power-consuming accessories like the water pump, etc., and also the emissions controls, exhaust system and air cleaner. In 2005 they tightened up the measurement standard again, with a thing called ‘SAE Certified Power’ which basically meant if a carmaker wanted to claim SAE Certification that they had to do it in an accredited lab, witnessed by an accredited third party. There’s a GERMAN STANDARD for power as well - it’s called DIN (D-I-N for German Institute for Standardisation) - basically very similar to the SAE net power standard. Again, it’s measured at the crank. All the ancillaries are connected. Power is expressed in PS. There are other European standards as well, in short So, in short, carmakers measurement of power all involve measuring at the crankshaft. None of them involve determining engine power by measuring it at the wheels. On the other hand measuring turbo cars with standard chassis dynos is usually very unreliable and quite often results in inflated HP figures, that happens if the dyno operators use the commonly applied "correction" factors for temp, elevation etc. Those will throw dyno figures for turbos cars way off. Me, i'll trust what BMW publishes. Chassis dynos are great for tuning and setting a baseline for tuning changes, then monitoring.checking results of changes. Seat of the pants dyno? fergit it. |
Appreciate
1
perfectlyfrank145.50 |
01-02-2023, 02:39 PM | #12 |
Private First Class
296
Rep 150
Posts |
I dyno’d mine before tuning.
I have euro model official rated at 374hp - 500nm torque On the dyno we measured (stock with catted downpipe and eventuri intake) 395hp - 560nm torque (Crank) After custom piggyback tune we got 465hp - 715nm torque (crank) |
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2023, 05:27 PM | #13 |
Captain
746
Rep 706
Posts |
WOW, a 70 hp and 155 nm torque gain after a tune!!! Of course that is taking advantage of the downpipe and intake changes but still, that is awesome. Stock injectors and turbo i assume. What is the max turbo boost to get those numbers? Didn't know the injectors could pump enough fuel for those gains.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2023, 02:33 PM | #15 |
Captain
746
Rep 706
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2023, 02:29 AM | #16 | |
Private First Class
123
Rep 179
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2023, 03:52 AM | #17 | |
Second Lieutenant
189
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2023, 04:05 PM | #19 | |
Banned
2087
Rep 1,559
Posts |
Quote:
Let's just round up and call it 500 hp. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|