[thielepr]

Has anyone installed the CSL knuckles? Good for -2.5 of camber. I know camber plates are more effective to get negative camber but the knuckles are OEM parts and it will look and feel like it came from the factory that way.

[Lappy]

I have them, you will get about 2.1-2.2, with mphas 2.4-2.5.

[71dsp]

Originally Posted by Lappy

I have them, you will get about 2.1-2.2, with mphas 2.4-2.5.

I’m looking at these as well. Do you know if it affects the tire/wheel to strut clearance? I’m running 19x10 Apex wheels with 285/35/19 tires and the clearance is tight. If the CSL carriers have even less clearance due to the added negative camber, I’m not sure I could run them.

[Lappy]

It will be fine, I run my car in solo so I'm limited to stock width wheels. On a 19x9.5 et 25 plus 12mm spacer so et13 there is plenty of space with a 285/35/19 re71rs.

[adenjr]

I'm running CSL Hubs with M Performance HAS, for an OEM+ setup to stay within the rules for the sprint class I run.. I'm getting -2.5 with this setup. I'm on 826M wheels with OEM Cup 2's, but will be trying a 19x11 square wheel setup soon - hoping that a 285 or 295 will fit without additional camber.. that way when I do eventually install camber plates I can go to 305 at the fronts on the same wheels.

[thielepr]

I have MP HAS so with the CSL knuckles I should get -2.5 wich is enough for me

[Vojta89]

Also thinking about these, my car is in production in couple of days… but my concerns are if adjustable top mounts will be enough, heard that G8X platform gives less range of top mount adjusting than F8X. Want track build with 3,6-3,8 negative in front. So I’m nit sure is that will be possible when F8X was limited to let’s say 3,9-4,0 negative in front