02-09-2025, 01:19 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 202
Rep 211
Posts |
Help me with this fitment math.
Stock g87 wheel sizes are
Front 9.5 x 19” ET20mm Rear 10.5 x 20” ET20mm a staggered Edelweiss LT3 set is Front 10.5 x 19" ET14mm Rear 11 x 20" ET12mm Compared to stock, the edelweiss fitment would be the equivalent of having around an 18mm spacer in front and 15mm in rear for the stock wheels. Is this correct? |
02-09-2025, 02:09 PM | #2 | |
Car Geek
![]() 4431
Rep 4,046
Posts |
Quote:
From a tyre clearance perspective, assuming some increase in tyre width to match the wheel width increase, the sidewall will be about 8mm closer to the strut and 19mm closer to the fender at the front, at the rear about 2mm further from the inner wheel well and 14mm closer to the fender. If you use the same tyres they will look more stretched and will not be as close to the strut or fender than the appropriately wider tyres. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2025, 07:22 PM | #3 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 202
Rep 211
Posts |
Quote:
The front wheel’s offset difference is 6mm(negative direction), meaning the new wheel sits 6mm further out compared to stock based on offset alone. Since it’s also 1 inch (about 25mm) wider overall, that adds roughly 12mm to each side. So in total, the wheel should sit about 18mm further out. Does that sound right, or am I misunderstanding how offset works? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2025, 08:06 PM | #4 | |
Car Geek
![]() 4431
Rep 4,046
Posts |
Quote:
Putting 295 or 305 wide tyres on all 4 wheels wider wheels would bring the tyres out to a point close to where the stock wheels and tyres with 18/15mm spacers would be. The 285/30-20 rear tyres are only recommended on rims up to 10.5" wide anyway. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2025, 08:09 PM | #5 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 202
Rep 211
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
aerobod4431.00 |
02-10-2025, 08:49 AM | #6 | |
Private First Class
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 184
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2009-2011 E90 320si street/track car - SOLD ; 2010-2016 E92 330d LCI street car - SOLD ; 2016-2018 F30 335d LCI street car - SOLD ; 2011-2021 E46 M3 track car - SOLD
2018-2024 F87 M2 Competition street/track car - SOLD ; 2021-???? 1986 E28 M535i show car ; 2025-???? G87 M2 street/track car My Instagram ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2025, 08:53 AM | #7 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 202
Rep 211
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2025, 12:20 PM | #8 | |
Car Geek
![]() 4431
Rep 4,046
Posts |
Quote:
A 275/35-19 MPS4S has a nominal width of 275mm, but the quoted measured value on a 9.5" wide rim is 277mm with a 249mm tread width. On a 10.5" rim it isn't going to have a measured width that increases by 25mm, it is going to be more like about 290mm and the tread width is still 249mm. The tread position is only going to move by the ET change in the wheel - 6mm in this case. A 295/30-19 MPS4S has a nominal width of 295mm, with a quoted measured value of 302mm on a 10.5" wide rim and a 279mm wide tread. It's sidewall will move out equivalent to a 23mm spacer on the stock wheel and tread will move out equivalent to a 21mm spacer on the stock wheel, but the position of the tread edge will be 8mm closer to the wheel centre. The 285/35-19 MPS4S has a tread width of 254mm, so it will be equivalent to using an 11mm spacer on the stock wheel when looking at the edge of the tread, which will also be 4mm further away from the wheel centre. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|