11-17-2010, 08:28 PM | #23 | |
Major
126
Rep 1,432
Posts |
Quote:
Admittedly it's debatable, I'm just of the opinion that BMW accomplished quite a bit of F1. I think we can all agree it's a huge pity they left, though. With drivers like Kubica and Heidfeld, they just needed to give them a good chassis to play with. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-17-2010, 08:33 PM | #24 | |
Major
126
Rep 1,432
Posts |
Quote:
When will people get it through their heads that F1 isn't about economy, efficiency, etc? F1 is supposed to be about the latest technology and the most outlandish solutions! I want to see F1 go back to the '90s and early 2000s; I want to see F1 cars once again made out of exotic materials like molybdenum and palladium. If I wanted to see road cars racing around bland tracks, I would just watch NASCAR. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-18-2010, 12:15 AM | #26 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
2016
Rep 61,781
Posts
Drives: A BBS WHORE
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: .
|
Quote:
BMW Sauber F1 aimed to score points in 2007, win their first win in 2008 (which they did luckily), and win the World Champion in 2009. They announced mid-season they will STOP develop the F1.08 when Kubica still leading the WDC, and start develop F1.09 chassis with KERS technology. Turns out, KERS became a weight burden and messed up the chassis balance. Also reliability issue caused the KERS system less effective than they thought, ends up fighting in the mid-to-rear field throughout the season.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|