12-20-2010, 12:52 PM | #23 |
Banned
149
Rep 2,014
Posts |
I am sure they will, they are bringin' it these days. Based on the blowers they offer for the 5.0 I don't think they will let this one be ignored.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2010, 04:34 PM | #25 |
Captain
28
Rep 805
Posts
Drives: 2011 Z4 35is Melbourne Red
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Portland, OR
|
NOw only if they would put that in the next generation Ranger and make a mini Lightning.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2010, 09:53 PM | #26 |
Back in a BMW
205
Rep 5,208
Posts |
4 HPFP and a water pump or 2
__________________
Ian
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2010, 11:44 PM | #27 |
There is No Substitute
74
Rep 1,186
Posts |
Chevy just builds better engines than BMW period. The LS3 puts out more power, for less pump shock than the S65, and for less money.
__________________
'13 Audi A6
'07 Porsche GT3 RS '08 BMW E90 335i |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2010, 04:07 AM | #28 | |
Private
8
Rep 99
Posts |
Quote:
These changes enable the F-150's version of the EcoBoost to deliver: • 365 horsepower at 5000 rpm (on regular fuel) • 420 lb.-ft. of torque at 2500 rpm (up to 90 percent of peak torque from 1700 rpm to 5000 rpm) • 11,300 pounds maximum trailer-towing capacity Official EPA mpg figures for the naturally aspirated engines will be released shortly. Because the EcoBoost V6 won't go on sale until early first quarter, 2011, its EPA label won't arrive for several months. However, discussions with Ford's engineering staff revealed that the boosted 3.5 liter should deliver approximately 5 percent better mileage compared to the 5.0-liter V8. Given the power advantage of the smaller turbo engine, we wanted to find out how this was possible. In urban and highway driving, under light loads, the 3.5 liter will run without the aid of its turbochargers. Because it's a smaller engine, the 3.5 liter has less frictional and parasitic losses than the 5.0 liter. This gives the smaller engine an edge in light-load fuel economy. When driving demands more throttle, the 3.5 liter uses boost to maximize its volumetric efficiency. Because of modern, heat-resistant materials in the turbos, a rich air–fuel mixture isn't required for cooling the intake charge to protect the turbos, so there's little fuel wasted to create 365 hp. However, the 5.0 liter is tuned for maximum fuel efficiency at part throttle, so when it is faced with heavy loads, it must add extra fuel to avoid combustion chamber overheating that results in dangerous preignition (knock). This means that fuel is being used for cooling, not combustion, giving the efficiency edge to the turbo engine in "loaded" driving. Link:http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...0-engine-specs |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|