[Tag]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Arrogance and well earned true knowledge are very different things, sir.

Fact of the matter is that you're incapable of responding as I've asked. So in order to remain "the top man," you resort to name calling while as least believing everyone else on the site will go along with it.

Again, owners manuals, build dates and other 8th grade study hall level silliness is entirely meaningless in the world of automotive engineering and the irrefutable mathematical and physical proofs that support it.

The peak of arrogance is accusing others who are vastly more knowledgeable of being arrogant.

AGAIN: In a simple sentence, explain to me what dictates tractive force at any given vehicle speed. (Suggestion: Don't bother me, make me look bad though name calling and then post the rolling eyes emoticon.

ChatGPT right on time.

[Ronin76]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Arrogance and well earned true knowledge are very different things, sir.

Fact of the matter is that you're incapable of responding as I've asked. So in order to remain "the top man," you resort to name calling while as least believing everyone else on the site will go along with it.

Again, owners manuals, build dates and other 8th grade study hall level silliness is entirely meaningless in the world of automotive engineering and the irrefutable mathematical and physical proofs that support it.

The peak of arrogance is accusing others who are vastly more knowledgeable of being arrogant.

AGAIN: In a simple sentence, explain to me what dictates tractive force at any given vehicle speed. (Suggestion: Don't bother me, make me look bad though name calling and then post the rolling eyes emoticon.

weren't you the guy who argued that the 2025 model wasn't going to have a 20HP but actually a 21HP pump? You that little that you had to argue over 1 HP or how it's actually calculated? You want to be that guy?

[M5wag]

Originally Posted by M2siast

I have no skin in this game as I’m having my popcorn on the sideline…. But food for thought, the person he’s belittling doesn’t own a G87…

Out of curiosity what do they own? Lol

[m2not1LE]

Originally Posted by Tag

ChatGPT right on time.

What grade are you in? Really? Have you ever been published in ANYTHING? What degrees do you hold and what patents do you have?

You posted a rolling eye response for no good reason while assuming I'm going to sit back and take it.

I am not nor should anyone else.

Please answer my specific engineering related questions or I'll permanently block you.

Your choice, Boba. (Note: "Star Wars" fantasy physics won't suffice in answering my technical questions.)

[m2not1LE]

Originally Posted by Ronin76

weren't you the guy who argued that the 2025 model wasn't going to have a 20HP but actually a 21HP pump? You that little that you had to argue over 1 HP or how it's actually calculated? You want to be that guy?

I didn't claim it. Rather, I posted the links from two well respected third party sources that did.

Can you see the difference in that, "Ronin?"

Now go ahead and answer the tractive force related questions I've posed to another member on here by interfering.

You two are clearly the super smart auto experts and I just need to reassured in the mathematics and physical proofs by relying on smarter folks such as yourselves.

[Ronin76]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

I didn't claim it. Rather, I posted the links from two well respected third party sources that did.

Can you see the difference in that, "Ronin?"

the point is, its 1 HP...does it matter whether its 20 or 21?

[Tag]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Nope.

What grade are you in? Really?

You posted a rolling ever response ad then think I'm going to let it stand.

Answer my specific engineering related questions or I'll permanently block you.

Your choice, Boba. (Note: "Star Wars" fantasy physics won't suffice in answering my technical questions.)

Mind tricks only work on the weak minded.

[m2not1LE]

Originally Posted by Ronin76

the point is, its 1 HP...does it matter whether its 20 or 21?

1 HP in a currently 453 HP (advertised) engine equates to a 0.2208% difference. No car could drive if individual component production tolerances were anything remotely close to that.

So yes it matters. That's actually a very large deviation from the baseline in anything remotely resembling what's required in the scientific and engineering fields.

Hey, which cartoons have you watched this week so far?

[m2not1LE]

Originally Posted by Tag

Mind tricks only work on the weak minded.

Answer my technical questions or I permanently block you because I will no longer sacrifice a second more of my time in this. Having said that, I thank you in proving my point by posting that ridiculous GIF.

[Carefree]

Hey Beavis the engineer, since you seem to have so much sway with the media, please contact your editor and have this published on our behalf:
GFY

[Ronin76]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

I didn't claim it. Rather, I posted the links from two well respected third party sources that did.

Can you see the difference in that, "Ronin?"

Now go ahead and answer the tractive force related questions I've posed to another member on here by interfering.

You two are clearly the super smart auto experts and I just need to reassured in the mathematics and physical proofs by relying on smarter folks such as yourselves.

I never claimed I am an auto expert or an expert in anything…I’m just a guy who likes cars. I am also not the guy who is so full of myself that I would promote my accomplishments (foolishly thinking it would impress others) any chance I get on a car forum.

[Ronin76]

Originally Posted by M2siast

You were out to lunch on that one man… almost like you didn’t read what you posted lol

I posted the figures and you kept chasing back with links to magazines and stuff

Right! I told you to just scroll lol.

[m2not1LE]

Originally Posted by Carefree

Hey Beavis the engineer, since you seem to have so much sway with the media, please contact your editor and have this published on our behalf:
GFY

Neither being published nor having an engineering degree requires having an editor.

Now that you chimed in, please answer by tractive force related questions (two so far).

Think we're going to get into the physics of brakes after this one...

We'll delve into the pros and cons of DOHC vs. single cam in block pushrod activated cylinder heads and resulting required engine architecture. This is going to be really fun, folks, so bring on the popcorn! Be sure to bring your build date sheets!

[Tag]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Answer my technical questions or I permanently block you because I will no longer sacrifice a second more of my time in this. Having said that, I thank you in proving my point by posting that ridiculous GIF.

[Carefree]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Neither being published nor having an engineering degree requires having an editor.

Now that you chimed in, please answer by tractive force related questions (two so far).

Think we're going to get into the physics of brakes after this one...

That wasn’t directed at you. I had you confused with another asshole.

[Ronin76]

Originally Posted by Carefree

That wasn’t directed at you. I had you confused with another asshole.

[Mr. Hankey]

Originally Posted by m2not1LE

Again, owners manuals, build dates and other 8th grade study hall level factoids are entirely meaningless in the world of automotive engineering and the irrefutable mathematical and physical proofs on which it's based.

Owners manuals, build dates, and 8th grade study hall factoids are not meaningless in automotive engineering. No more as meaningless than "definitive" mathematical proofs are meaningless in the real world. Materials engineering - the 4th dimension is time my friend, build date much? You can't take the math out of context of the natural system it's predicting. What you say makes no sense.

Your proofs go out the window because rain....and random wind gusts starting at about 38 kph, the nail you just hit with your tire, temperature asymptotes. Harmonic oscillators explain it all much more elegantly in predictive traction models than an intro to engineering proof homework question.

And I look forward to the DOHC and pushrod questions. Here's my project while waiting for BMW to produce and deliver a G87 (thus keeping this thread on topic)

[Tag]

Originally Posted by Mr. Hankey

Here's my project while waiting for BMW to produce and deliver a G87 (thus keeping this thread on topic)

What's that going into?

[Mr. Hankey]

Originally Posted by Tag

What's that going into?

Building a Shelby Daytona Coupe for the track (Factory Five).





Again, while waiting for BMW to blow my mind with how quickly they can throw together a G87 and deliver it across the world (hence staying on topic of course).

[Tag]

Originally Posted by Mr. Hankey

Building a Shelby Daytona Coupe for the track (Factory Five).

Again, while waiting for BMW to blow my mind with how quickly they can throw together a G87 with mind-blowing engineering compared to this dinosaur [juice burner]...

Wicked build, you have to post pics of it next to your G87 whenever it's done.

[Good 4 2 reasons]

While Mom and Dad fight, after 21 days, I finally moved from "final assembly" to "ready for transport"

[Mr. Hankey]

Originally Posted by Good 4 2 reasons

While Mom and Dad fight, after 21 days, I finally moved from "final assembly" to "ready for transport"

Hopefully your wait isn't long at this stage. Fingers crossed.