07-16-2007, 09:32 AM | #45 | |
Private
3
Rep 61
Posts |
Quote:
Not only that, but with a few upgrades we should be able to take around 200 lbs off the 135. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2007, 10:22 AM | #46 | |
always notorious
2
Rep 98
Posts |
Quote:
If you have PROcede, Xede, etc. on your 335 you voided your engine warranty. And as for the Magnusson-Moss Act, it's extremely simple for BMW to prove the software in your car isn't the factory software. All they have to do is run a quick diagnostic and it will show the faults everywhere. And any modification of the DME voids any engine warranty you have. Plain and simple. And it never fails. Whenever a new model comes out these comparisons will always rear its ugly head. The one thing that always happens is that people compare apples to oranges. You cannot compare a stock vehicle to a modified one. It's simply not the same thing - no matter how much you argue - it's a stock vehicle vs. a modified one and it's not a direct comparison. Now, to answer the OP's original question. I don't think BMW killed the sales of the M3 with the 335/135. An M3 is always going to be an M3 and it will always have its own market. The strength of the 335/135 isn't going to impeded on that demographic mainly because it's simply a different demographic. It's the same with the 135 killing the 335. It's not going to happen because the demographic is different.
__________________
stockwerks
Last edited by tdc; 07-16-2007 at 11:04 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2007, 10:26 AM | #47 |
Major General
1780
Rep 6,669
Posts |
Again, the weight and power/TQ outputs are not the only factors... The gearing, CG position, balance, etc play role, too.
Read this: http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/corvette_z06.asp Example C06: wt: 3132 lbs, 505HP/470 ft-lbs., 0-60: 3.7s Porche Turbo: wt: 3494 lbs, 480HP/460 ft-lbs., 0-60: 3.7s Porche is 350 lbs heavier, less power, but still same 0-60 times, so... We'll have to wait and see... |
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2007, 10:55 AM | #48 |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 31
Posts
Drives: 2006 black e90 330xi
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bergen County, NJ
|
335 better than m3
I think that bmw never took into account the mods that a select few owners of 335i would do to their cars. They almost always power the m3 about 100 hp more than the highest level Non M 3 series. Most people of the 335i will never mod their car more than rims and/or intake + exhaust if at all. Someone made a point before that most 335i's are stock The 335i members of this forum are a rare breed ie. small percentage of people who will mod their cars even at the risk of losing the warranty. That can be called passion in some cases. I have a e36 m3 but BMW has upped the price of the next m3 a little out of my reach so I will wait until year 3 to buy one. It will be approx 10k less at that point. I currently have a e90 330xi but I will be trading/selling that for a 335i next year. I think the 335i is THE BEST VALUE IN THE AUTO WORLD. The engine and the car will be talked about 20-25 years from now.
Last edited by rchat1975; 07-16-2007 at 10:56 AM.. Reason: emphasis |
Appreciate
0
|
07-16-2007, 12:40 PM | #49 | |
Major General
1780
Rep 6,669
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-17-2007, 03:31 PM | #52 | |
hi
98
Rep 837
Posts |
Quote:
you bring up some interesting points but I'm pretty sure if you find a good dealership or know someone, you can get around keeping your warranty with an ECU tune. i also disagree that we cannot compare modified cars to stock cars, especially in this situation. i mean yeah, modified vs. stock is unfair if it's some sort of huge engine swap vs. a stock car. but this is nothing but a $1200 mod (cheaper than new tires) that drastically changes the performance, and in many ways makes it much better than the M3 for alot less money. you do have a good point about the demographic, true the two cars have began to attract completely different types of buyers. IMO the M3 has always been the ultimate enthusiast BMW since the e30... but the tables seem tohave turned with the e92. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-20-2007, 02:26 PM | #53 |
Razor sharp handling
25
Rep 619
Posts |
I love how this same conversation comes up every time. I remember when the e46 330ci came out and it was as fast as the e36 m3, 5.4 or 5.5 0-60. Everyone on bimmerforums flipped out arguing about it. I also remember when the e36 328is came out and it was 6.6 seconds 0-60, faster than the e30 m3, which was very upsetting to a lot of people who owned M3s. When the e36 M3 was released, everyone said it was too soft and luxurious and not a real M car anymore. When the e46 M3 came out, everyone said it finally had enough power, but that the steering was too light, and that it was too isolated compared to the e36 M3. These correlations aren't accidents, they're part of the marketing plan. The e92 M3 will be great, and before long, there will be another non-M coupe that matches its performance ad infinitum...
__________________
1997 E36 328is Arctic Silver: 1997-2003 100k Mi. SOLD
2000 Audi TT Quattro Coupe Lake Silver: 2003-present 35k Mi. SOLD 2006 Lotus Elise Polar Blue/Red 2007 E92 335i Spacegrau/Coral/Al | ZSP/ZPP/ZCW/CA/PDC/NAV Broken in |
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 04:30 AM | #54 | |
Private First Class
15
Rep 100
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 03:12 PM | #55 |
Lieutenant General
1232
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Two things:
1) Very few people mod their cars. The M3 is the far better choice for those that want the power without touching the cars settings. 2) Why did the engineers over at the M Division knock the size of the engine down from 5 to 4 liters? It seems like they could've gotten so much more out of it. Limiting themselves to 4 just seems kind of strange...even the 2 year old RS4 uses a 4.2 liter V8. Would it really have made the engine that much heavier or something? |
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 03:22 PM | #56 |
.
875
Rep 3,993
Posts |
For serious track duty, the heat that the turbo generates underhood can, and does handicap it. (see magazine articles, You Tube video, etc. ) One of my clients has a GT3 Cup Car, he said the Turbo 911 couldn't come close to surviving a race like the NA Porsches can.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 03:23 PM | #57 | |
Captain
57
Rep 879
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 03:48 PM | #58 |
Klaatu Barada Nikto
30
Rep 1,169
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 03:56 PM | #59 |
Klaatu Barada Nikto
30
Rep 1,169
Posts |
The one thing that I still find incredible about the 335i is the mileage for the amount of power and especially the torque. While many potential owners of the new M3 probably wouldn't give a hoot, that puppy's published MPG's look very thirsty.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 06:52 PM | #60 | |
Lieutenant General
1830
Rep 17,322
Posts |
Quote:
i mean, its way too hot and theres way too much traffic in some areas; driving without a/c and a radio would suck and driving in the rain, forget about it in a CSL lol |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-13-2007, 08:02 PM | #61 |
Free taco with stolen base
30
Rep 639
Posts |
I think BMW killed the M3 with the M3.
The 335i is an awesome car, and it's finally what a non-M BMW should have been all along. The problem is, BMW has softened up the M cars with every succession. The M cars arent improving at the same rate as the non-M cars, which inevitably closes the gap.
__________________
lllM |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:40 AM | #63 |
Lieutenant Colonel
63
Rep 1,914
Posts |
when did M3 become a drag car? the way many of you put it made it sound like M3 supposed to be super fast in a straightline, but you know what? it's NOT! it's fast but compare to others in the same price range, there are faster cars (ie. Vett, GTR, etc..).
now, you can mod a 335i to make it "faster" than a M3 for probably less money, but it's NOT a true M. what defines a M is the overall performance, the "balance"..not big horse power. If you want big power, go get an AMG.. nothing touches those! I read it in one of my mags (was it Motrotred? automobile? C&D? one of those) that did an interview with a M designer... the guy said it's easy to make huge power (like AGM), but what BMW tries to accomplish is a car that's balanced in everyway and a track machine. when going on a track, balance and handling is more important than just pure HP .. those that kept saying 335i will kill a M3 blah blah blah is really missing the point of a M. is it overpriced? yes.. can you make a 335i/135i faster w/less money? yes. but you will not make a 335i drive like a M because it's missing many things that truely make a M.. a M!! for godsake, a 335i doesnt even have a LSD.. it's NOT a true track car compare to an M so this is a mood point. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:55 AM | #64 |
Major
29
Rep 1,002
Posts |
you kids are ridiculous. bmw was entirely smart, they are making the M3's in far lower quantities now. BMW is not interested in M sells because it's not their primary market, right now they are concerned with making cars that only compete with other BMW models that way there is more incentive to buy a BMW. it used to be that people only bought a BMW over a Mercedes if they could afford an M series. NOW that they have entirely overtaken mercedes in overall sales, they want to spread their general market share.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 02:59 AM | #65 |
Troll Harder
403
Rep 596
Posts
Drives: 997 GT3, 997 4 GTS, X6M
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal, Beirut
|
I'd take an M3 over my 335...
the amount of cash/time/effort u'd have to drop into the 335 to make it HANDLE like an M3 is not worth it.. ppl put too much emphasis on 1/4 miles... no they didn't kill it it is still a superior car...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2008, 10:16 PM | #66 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 136
Posts |
To be honest i think anyone that is getting an e92 m3 see a 135i next to them speeding away will not even bother to give it a second glance or a thought that ya he could take me. Im pretty sure the m3 guy will think wow what a idiot.
NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE IN A FUTRE 135I but your still a 1 series to alllllllll bmw owners |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|