05-16-2007, 02:31 AM | #67 | |
Banned
220
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
So what if SRT-8's engine is a big fat 6.1 liter? Would you like to put that against Porsche's 911 Turbo ONLY 3.6 Inline 6 cylinder Engine? Engine size does not matter! It's the output of the engine, combined with other factors (like transmission, curb weight etc) that really make the car.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:42 AM | #68 | |
Banned
220
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
If you run you car at LACR in Los Angeles you will get 13.5 or slower, so it all depends.... Just my opinion....
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 03:10 AM | #69 | |
Brigadier General
550
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
Sure all tracks are different but at ATCO, his car would be 12.6 stock. Looking at dragtimes, there isn't one 335i that has cracked 12's stock anywhere.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 07:18 AM | #70 |
Major General
166
Rep 5,389
Posts |
Nice number for 1/4 mi...and that was stock? PROcede 335i's are now running 12.5x-12.6x sec. @ 108+mph 1/4 mi. (and ~ 4.5-4.6 sec. 0-60mph).
__________________
|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod | | TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers | |
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 07:41 AM | #71 |
Banned
110
Rep 3,120
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 08:10 AM | #72 | |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 08:15 AM | #73 |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
Your 100% correct. But when I made that pass it was in positive DA. Which means I was racing in air that was higher elevation than the track which in turn means thinner and less dense air which mean slower times (for you guys who are new to drag racing)They were a few guys over in LA who ran 13.1 stock with the 300c srt8. The charger's are a little bit heavier and are consistantly 1 to 2/10ths slow than the 300s.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 08:18 AM | #74 |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 08:25 AM | #75 |
Moderator
7544
Rep 19,368
Posts |
I really don't understand how anyone could read this thread and expect anything serious. I mean the guy's co-worker clearly has plenty of issues and is obviously unable to deal with them maturely. The thread is pretty much a big joke to mock that situation isn't it?
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 08:27 AM | #76 |
Major
65
Rep 1,141
Posts |
I raced one recently. Wasn't really a race more like just messing around on the highway. It completely owned me. Funny thing though it was an older male, was very cool guy just having fun. I would expect him to be driving an M5 instead, maybe he is a American auto fan.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 11:59 AM | #77 | |
Banned
220
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
Well, it looks like you'd be very close to the times of an E60 M5 then... With over 100 lbs heavier and 75 hp less....
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 12:08 PM | #78 | |
Pirate
123
Rep 1,395
Posts |
Quote:
Yea, but thats a given considering you have a 328i... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 12:17 PM | #79 | |
Major General
1780
Rep 6,669
Posts |
Quote:
By the way did I ever claim the 325 can or cannot beat the Neon? If I wanted to buy the car to race, I would have done so... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 01:09 PM | #80 |
Major General
85
Rep 5,732
Posts |
Sorry guys but this has turned into a Mullet Thread.......
__________________
__________________________
2016 435 xdrive GC white on black leather interior, Msport1, Msport2, premium package 2015 Lincoln MKX, silver on brown leather, premium package - that's right! Techno-Groovy baby |
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:12 PM | #81 | |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
Quote:
Lets get this clear, I'm no where near the times of a e60 m5. If it's in the hands of a good driver he will get 12.1 @116-118. However, most e60 owners find it a hand full to launch without lighting up the tires in 1st and 2nd gear. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:37 PM | #83 | |
Banned
220
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:42 PM | #84 | |
My favorite sign.
175
Rep 4,338
Posts |
Quote:
Engine: 6.1L OHV V-8, 425 hp, 420 lb-ft Drive: Rear-wheel 0-60 mph: 5.0 sec Top speed: 165 mph I'm guessing that part of the reason for it's slower acceleration times have to do with its BS "manu-matic" tranny. I'm guessing that the dodge's huge front end also increases drag which will slow it down as well. Think of it like this...you have a brick shaped object vs a bullet shaped object...what's gonna pass through the air better... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:48 PM | #85 | |
Major
64
Rep 1,476
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 02:58 PM | #86 |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
I saw that a long time ago (maybe a few months...lol). IMO It's not fair to compare the e60 m5 to the srt8. The M5 is miles ahead in price, build quality, hp, etc. It's a overall better car.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 03:05 PM | #87 |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2007, 03:08 PM | #88 | |
Private
6
Rep 58
Posts |
Quote:
Very true. The pcm only allows 75% throttle in 1st gear and it reduces the torque during shifts between gears. Damn you Chrysler I have gotten the car up to 171mph on several occassions and it's governed. Last edited by nyc_srt8; 05-16-2007 at 03:25 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|