|
|
01-02-2007, 01:56 AM | #23 | |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
Quote:
You are a bit naive to think that those that choose SMG are somhow lesser drivers. We just tend to be more willing to accept progress. Want to guess what I view as the biggest advantage for SMG in the hands of a very experienced driver? Its not what you think. With SMG you can left foot brake and make much better gas-brake-gas transition than you can with a manual. There is no less "perfection" goign on, you are just working on keepign the car finely ballanced at the limit of cornering rather than trying not to spin off the track when you shift. I do admit with SMG you will never get to tell the tale of your perfect 4-1 downshift or have the rack of bent valves to show off as proof
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2007, 07:27 AM | #24 | |
Registered
0
Rep 4
Posts |
Quote:
Now I have finally found someone who is intelligent and not full of themselves. You should all listen to this individual, you might learn a thing or two! My props go out to you! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2007, 08:51 AM | #25 |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2007, 06:00 PM | #26 |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
One thing to remember guys is the comment that "you are having less fun than the guy rowing his own gears" is entirely subjective. Its also one I don't agree with having tracked both types of cars.
Its important to distinguish fact from opinion.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-02-2007, 11:55 PM | #27 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
I agree it is my opinion that shifting my own gears is more fun than having a machine do it for me. The sad thing is that in the future shifting will become a "lost art" since all the "kids" of today will only have DSGs or automatics (SMGs will be gone -- too jerky for street cars). I drive an S2000 (S/C) and an E36 M3 on the track. The M3 turns slightly better times even though it is down on power, but the S2000 is incredibly satisfying to drive because of how much of a "driver's car" it is (can you say OVERSTEER?). The 9K redline and quick-shifting gearbox in harmony with one another are two of the things that make it such a delight to drive fast. You feel the engine through the shift lever, and you feel that direct link between "man and machine." The chassis balances on the edge of oversteer, but you can use that to your advantage to exit corners faster (due to added traction under acceleration). It is a WILD ride compared to the poised M3. It is much harder to get every last tenth out of the S2000, and it can be intimidating. But this all adds to the reward. With modern stability control systems, SMG/DSG, throttle by wire, brake by wire, and even "active" steering cars are becoming more and more like video games and it becomes harder for a driver to truly understand what a car is doing at its limits, and how to learn and use these dynamics to drive the car faster. I don't necessarily consider SMG progress. In most cases I call it a way for BMW, etc. to sell a performance car to a person who can't drive a manual. I guess that is OK -- until they dumb-down the M5 manual and break my heart The progress street cars are making usually does NOT make them better driver's cars (as you know, of course, now that I see you drive an Elise - very nice!). More weight, more tech, more gizmos. These things sell to the masses of fairly wealthy people who can afford new cars (esp. BMWs). They sure don't make for a more satisfying performance drive. Yes they are faster, and will lap faster, especially in the hands of novices (since all the electro-nannies will save their butts at every corner), but not as much fun. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2007, 12:09 AM | #28 |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
I just like to razz the people that keep saying that SMG owners just buy them because they don't know how to drive a manual. 99% of them don't have a clue what real driving is.
For most of the same reason you list in your post I don't drive my BMW at the track any more. Its simply not a fun car. Its a GT car for the street, not a track toy. Its to heavy and big. However, with the lotus the two things I find myself missing from the BMW are the wider powerband and SMG. Once I got really used to left foot braking all the time is sucked to have to go back to using the damn clutch. Now all I end up thinking about is the time I am losing by not being able to ballance the car as well as I could if I didn't still have this archain interface. It think another part of it is the Elise like your S2000 isn't exactly a slow reacting and forgiving car like your E36 or my E46. You really, really don't want to make a mistake with your cornering in either of those cars.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2007, 12:22 AM | #29 |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
Quick comment on the upsize of progress.
One thing that having a throwback stipper car like the lotus does is make you appriciate just how far cars have come in a good way. Its rare I drive it on the street simply because its a much less enjoyable drive when you are not carving up roads at > 8/10th. Things like: good temp control sound deadning bumpers good headlights comfortable seats heated seats power windows working defogger working weather seals stability over ruts in the road DSC BMW engines (nice wider powerband) Those are all things we take for granted in our relavitly comfortable and heavy cars. The tradeoff is worth it about 80% of the time. Sadly when its go time you often wish you could temporarly eject most of them.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2007, 12:32 PM | #32 |
Lieutenant
13
Rep 407
Posts |
The choice of SMG or MT is a personal preference. Speaking for myself, who only drives on the street, I really don't care which trans makes the car faster by .5 second. What's important for me is what I want out of the overall driving experience. For me this means becoming part of or an extension of the machine and immersing myself in the feel, handling and responsiveness. I can only satisfy this need with a MT, IMO... Call me old fashioned.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2007, 11:38 PM | #34 |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Our pleasure (Enigma, I hope you don't mind me speaking for you )
BTW, Enigma and I PM'ed back and forth a bit and I discovered I actually DID race him at Thunderhil (Northern CA) about six months ago. He was running like a mother in his Elise and I was driving the piss out of my student's Ferrari F430 (yes, lucky bastard). Ironically enough, his Elise was a manual and the Ferrari I was driving had an SMG So who won? Let's see, 493 HP vs. 195 HP -- OK, not a fair race . . . I drove fast enough to make my student puke (fortunately, outside of the Ferrari). Enigma was one of the fastest Elise driver's I've seen! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2007, 12:04 AM | #35 |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
I am sure this is one of the students driving and not you. Its the only Ferrari I remember catching on video that day. There were quite a few there.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...39352705584770 My best laps 2:04 were earlier in the day. The extra HP of the ferrari would just kill me out of T15 but the lighter weight and better tires would make most of it right back up in T2.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2007, 12:26 AM | #36 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
2:04s? In a stock Elise with race rubber? What kind of tires you running? I put down 2:03s in a 3100 lb M3 with 270 crank HP, suspension, and RA1s. Impressive driving, Enigma!! And great vid! How did you get the g-meter and speedo ON the video. That is SO COOL! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2007, 02:10 AM | #37 | |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
Quote:
That was the first day I drove on an aftermarket suspension and I was having some issues. It was a bit of a dial in day. The car stock, on OEM tires would probably max out around 2:05 bypass / 2:07 Cyclone. I had/have RA-1s on my car which are worth about 1s over the OEM Yoko 048s. After sorting the suspension issues I have picked up quite a bit of time there. The datalogger is showing a best of sectors as 2:01 for the bypass now though I have yet to put that together in one lap. Which config was the 2:03? I know NASA usually run the bypass. I also have some video of Laguna Seca in the SMG M3 and Elise that makes a nice comparison of how easy to drive and stable the BMW is compared to the lightweight car if anyone is interested. The one time I tried to hammer the M3 around thunderhill I set the brakes on fire ending my day early. So I don't have any good video from it there, just stuff from when I was learning the track.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2007, 06:04 PM | #38 |
First Lieutenant
13
Rep 308
Posts |
Nice driving!!
Ok, so I started playing a little game while watching a few mins of that video. It was called, "Whose he gonna catch next?" I loved the moment I heard myself say Holy Schmidt it's another elise driver, and he/she should go change their pants!
Anyway, nice job on the vid and discussion. This is my first post while awaiting the new car. It’s to be the dream car I promised myself as a child. Thankfully I survived a little 7-month trip to the desert and had the option for factory direct pricing. Hopefully it will turn out to be more fun to drive than my current S2000. OT, I am also trying to decide upon the tranny. MT seems like it would be more fun, while the SMG is the coming wave. My fear is it wouldn't be as engaging though would probably help hold the value in the end. My final questions to the group: for those who have driven previous versions of the SMG, is it possible to drive the car smoothly? A test drive is one thing, but once you have become familiar with the car, do passengers still snap their necks? Also, and this is asking for a simple guess, have BMW engineers listened to previous complaints about removing the driver from the driving experience? It seems each successive M3 has its drivers enjoying the new power while longing for it to be mixed with the driving experience of the E30. I don’t want to regret trading my $55K for a sterile though quicker car. Thanks! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-04-2007, 07:21 PM | #39 |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
It took me about a month to completly figure the system out. Part of it taking that long is I took delivery of one of the first SMG cars in the US so there wasn't a large amound of knowledge about how to do things like shift smoothly at the time.
Yes, you can pretty much drive the car just like a manual if you desire. It not possible to be as smooth as an auto though simply because you still have a clutch and the car stops accelerating during shifts.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2007, 01:37 AM | #40 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
I cannot believe how fast you get your Elise around a big HP track like T-hill! The mags (Car and Driver, I think) tested the Elise vs. the S2000 and it was only 1 second faster than the S2K around Ginerman (I think). I think they did not know how to drive the Elise like you do:rocks: In a straight line a think your Elise is quicker than my M3 at slow speeds, even at 60-80 MPH, and then I'd pull on you due to the extra HP. Cornering your Elise will simply cream the M3. Send along some more video from laguna! Come to Laguna this Sunday -- we will be trying out our new GPS-based data logger, and my buddy (with the black F430) will be bringing his new grey F430 w/ F1 trans.) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2007, 02:10 AM | #41 | |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
Quote:
The Elise is a hard car to drive fast at the track. You cannot slow down or bleed much speed since it takes a long time to get going again. It also doesn't really like the super smooth driving style that most cars reward. It took me a while to adjust after leaving the M3. Here is a good lap in the Elise at Laguna. Ok good up to T11, read comments below the video as to what happened: http://www.justracing.com/galleries/...album=86&pos=0 Full session on google, lower quality, including a battle with Z06 http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...40764726878137 Same track in the M3 from a while back. Wasn't as agressve back then. The M3 was on fairly stiff springs 525/600, stock drivetrain, PSCs on stock wheels. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...72996531410033 Notice the drastic diffrence in the steering wheel inputs. The M3 rewards smooth, gentle inputs while the lighter car can be tossed around a lot more.
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-05-2007, 11:58 PM | #42 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
I haven't taken lap times at Laguna in a couple years. I posted a good battle with a GT3 on youtube: 1:42 is an amazing time at that track, though. I think I was running 1:48 back then, so even with the 255 rubber on the car now and some more tricks up my sleeve 1:42 would be quite a feat. I will be there with my 06 Civic Si (commuter car) and the data logger. I'll be psyched if I can better 1:58 on my all-season street tires |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 12:25 AM | #43 | |
Captain
13
Rep 689
Posts |
Quote:
Did that Gt3 happen to be driven by John?
__________________
Manual gearboxes, the rotary dial of cars.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 11:39 PM | #44 | |
Captain
36
Rep 625
Posts |
Quote:
We'll see what my K20-powered Civic can do tomorrow! I'll see about grabbing some video . . . |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|