BMW M3 and M4 - The Icons
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
home
G80 BMW M3 and M4 General Topics BMW M3 (G80), M4 (G82), CSL and 3.0 CSL General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-30-2021, 10:06 AM   #1
CanAutM3
General
CanAutM3's Avatar
Canada
21125
Rep
20,742
Posts

Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
M4 6MT - Test review by Auto Motor und Sport



AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Weighed in at 1,675kg

Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Attached Images
 
__________________
Porsche 911 turbo 2021 992 GT Silver

Previous cars: M4cs 2019 F82 Limerock Grey / M4 2015 F82 Silverstone / M3 2008 E92 Silverstone / M3 2002 E46 Carbon Black

Last edited by CanAutM3; 05-30-2021 at 11:58 AM..
Appreciate 1
zamboni1132.00
      05-30-2021, 11:12 AM   #2
PLF69
Colonel
PLF69's Avatar
3770
Rep
2,700
Posts

Drives: 2023 M3
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Quebec

iTrader: (0)

That red press car is sure to come out abused of all those reviews
__________________
Fun/HPDE: 2023 M3 6MT Individual Malachite
Past:2023 M4 CSL, 2022 M4C Vert, 2020 M340i, 2018 M2, 2015 M235i, 2008 135i 550whp
Daily: 2023 X5 45e
Daily/Family: 2021 Atlas Cross Sport 3.6
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 11:24 AM   #3
CanAutM3
General
CanAutM3's Avatar
Canada
21125
Rep
20,742
Posts

Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLF69 View Post
That red press car is sure to come out abused of all those reviews
It has to be said that this particular 2014 test car was unusually quick
__________________
Porsche 911 turbo 2021 992 GT Silver

Previous cars: M4cs 2019 F82 Limerock Grey / M4 2015 F82 Silverstone / M3 2008 E92 Silverstone / M3 2002 E46 Carbon Black
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 11:34 AM   #4
dialogical
Lieutenant
dialogical's Avatar
695
Rep
485
Posts

Drives: G80 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
Appreciate 1
Vintage380.50
      05-30-2021, 11:50 AM   #5
akkando
Major General
akkando's Avatar
5869
Rep
6,638
Posts

Drives: 17 M2 DCT LBB,11 e90 M3 ZCP IB
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
It does beg the question though, if speed isn't your thing, why not an f82 or f87 in MT? You would save a buck, they're lighter and smaller too.
Appreciate 1
JTO245276.00
      05-30-2021, 11:55 AM   #6
BimmerMat135
Major
Canada
706
Rep
1,449
Posts

Drives: E82M/S213 E450 A/T
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Montréal Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
Still it's should be better than the previous car. Otherwise they should just lower their MSRP.
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 12:10 PM   #7
seis-speed
#savethemanuals
seis-speed's Avatar
United_States
2440
Rep
1,981
Posts

Drives: 1M | GT3 | J392 | GRc
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post
It has to be said that this particular 2014 test car was unusually quick
I have driven a lot of F80’s....The 2014-2015 cars felt faster.

People on here complained about the car being too raw, too stiff, and hard to control (could not put the power down). So BMW changed the power band significantly and added adaptive suspension as a standard option.
Appreciate 1
Hedoniste3847.00
      05-30-2021, 12:43 PM   #8
dialogical
Lieutenant
dialogical's Avatar
695
Rep
485
Posts

Drives: G80 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by akkando View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
It does beg the question though, if speed isn't your thing, why not an f82 or f87 in MT? You would save a buck, they're lighter and smaller too.
The impact of the G80's larger size is negligible in the real world, and the F80s interior is seriously deficient by comparison.

The G80 also has the better chassis.

The M2 is a great car, but too small for my needs.
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 01:17 PM   #9
akkando
Major General
akkando's Avatar
5869
Rep
6,638
Posts

Drives: 17 M2 DCT LBB,11 e90 M3 ZCP IB
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by akkando View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
It does beg the question though, if speed isn't your thing, why not an f82 or f87 in MT? You would save a buck, they're lighter and smaller too.
The impact of the G80's larger size is negligible in the real world, and the F80s interior is seriously deficient by comparison.

The G80 also has the better chassis.

The M2 is a great car, but too small for my needs.
Interior quality is never really what attracted me to platform over competitors but maybe I'm just out of touch.
Appreciate 2
seis-speed2440.00
2011ninja3412.50
      05-30-2021, 01:42 PM   #10
dialogical
Lieutenant
dialogical's Avatar
695
Rep
485
Posts

Drives: G80 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: MA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by akkando View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by akkando View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dialogical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post


AM&S M4 6MT Tested

Conclusion:
Negative: the high weight and the wide body. Apart from that, we celebrate the feedback-friendly chassis, the inspiring handling, the tight six-cylinder - and the manual transmission.


Interestingly, the car they tested is slower than the F82 6MT they tested back in 2014:
Curious - although if pure speed is your top concern then the manual is not the right pick.
It does beg the question though, if speed isn't your thing, why not an f82 or f87 in MT? You would save a buck, they're lighter and smaller too.
The impact of the G80's larger size is negligible in the real world, and the F80s interior is seriously deficient by comparison.

The G80 also has the better chassis.

The M2 is a great car, but too small for my needs.
Interior quality is never really what attracted me to platform over competitors but maybe I'm just out of touch.
Eh, it's preference. Interior quality is definitely less important than driving dynamics, but if I'm spending $85k on a car then there's a minimum quality level the interior needs to reach.
Appreciate 3
      05-30-2021, 04:03 PM   #11
02M3ForMe
Lieutenant Colonel
4268
Rep
1,625
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

The G8x goes around corners way better than the non-CS F8x. The delta over the excellent F80 CS is smaller, but still significant. The G8x gives you practically all of the F87 handling improvements over the F80/82 and more without the 2-series compromises. If you're OK with the look, the G8x is the easy choice, especially with used cars being overpriced relative to 'outdated' MSRP pricing set during very different market conditions.
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 06:19 PM   #12
CanAutM3
General
CanAutM3's Avatar
Canada
21125
Rep
20,742
Posts

Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 02M3ForMe View Post
The G8x goes around corners way better than the non-CS F8x. The delta over the excellent F80 CS is smaller, but still significant. The G8x gives you practically all of the F87 handling improvements over the F80/82 and more without the 2-series compromises. If you're OK with the look, the G8x is the easy choice, especially with used cars being overpriced relative to 'outdated' MSRP pricing set during very different market conditions.
As a reference below what AM&S wrote about the F82 in the same categories. Notice how they describe the F82 neutrality as a positive while the understeering nature of the G82 is put as a negative. It's not the first time that the understeering nature of the G8X is criticized.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Porsche 911 turbo 2021 992 GT Silver

Previous cars: M4cs 2019 F82 Limerock Grey / M4 2015 F82 Silverstone / M3 2008 E92 Silverstone / M3 2002 E46 Carbon Black
Appreciate 0
      05-30-2021, 08:01 PM   #13
02M3ForMe
Lieutenant Colonel
4268
Rep
1,625
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanAutM3 View Post
As a reference below what AM&S wrote about the F82 in the same categories. Notice how they describe the F82 neutrality as a positive while the understeering nature of the G82 is put as a negative. It's not the first time that the understeering nature of the G8X is criticized.
In this review, the G8x was praised for its “fun factor” and “turning pleasure” despite the noted understeer (which must be at the limit since I have yet to feel it on the street). These are 2021 impressions contextualized by 2021 expectations; we all know the F8x was a great car for its time. In 2014, we were all impressed.

Contrary to the speculation, the bigger, heavier G8x is sharper, grippier, and more agile than the F8x. Far from a “mini M5”, the new M3/4 is as close to the benchmark 911 as any generation has ever gotten.

Anecdotally, we’re seeing several M2C -> G8x migrants. Most consciously passed over the bigger, more powerful F80/82 to get at the M2C’s significantly better handling. These are the folks who really care about sport driving pleasure and spend accordingly. Some have overcome intense dislike of the exterior design to make the switch. I think the trend should be interesting to those who have yet to test drive the new car.
Appreciate 2
VIERsr2623.00
BimmerFix1404.00
      05-30-2021, 11:39 PM   #14
LOW4LYF
Brigadier General
LOW4LYF's Avatar
2164
Rep
4,110
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 & F85 X5M
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: @Home

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02M3ForMe View Post
In this review, the G8x was praised for its “fun factor” and “turning pleasure” despite the noted understeer (which must be at the limit since I have yet to feel it on the street). These are 2021 impressions contextualized by 2021 expectations; we all know the F8x was a great car for its time. In 2014, we were all impressed.

Contrary to the speculation, the bigger, heavier G8x is sharper, grippier, and more agile than the F8x. Far from a “mini M5”, the new M3/4 is as close to the benchmark 911 as any generation has ever gotten.

Anecdotally, we’re seeing several M2C -> G8x migrants. Most consciously passed over the bigger, more powerful F80/82 to get at the M2C’s significantly better handling. These are the folks who really care about sport driving pleasure and spend accordingly. Some have overcome intense dislike of the exterior design to make the switch. I think the trend should be interesting to those who have yet to test drive the new car.
Spot on!

After driving the F90 AWD and G80 RWD in Sonoma... I can just lol over this mini M5 nonsense.
Appreciate 2
02M3ForMe4267.50
BimmerFix1404.00
      05-31-2021, 02:26 PM   #15
mzcp
Lieutenant Colonel
2692
Rep
1,740
Posts

Drives: BMW M
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: CA California

iTrader: (16)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 02M3ForMe View Post
In this review, the G8x was praised for its “fun factor” and “turning pleasure” despite the noted understeer (which must be at the limit since I have yet to feel it on the street). These are 2021 impressions contextualized by 2021 expectations; we all know the F8x was a great car for its time. In 2014, we were all impressed.

Contrary to the speculation, the bigger, heavier G8x is sharper, grippier, and more agile than the F8x. Far from a “mini M5”, the new M3/4 is as close to the benchmark 911 as any generation has ever gotten.

Anecdotally, we’re seeing several M2C -> G8x migrants. Most consciously passed over the bigger, more powerful F80/82 to get at the M2C’s significantly better handling. These are the folks who really care about sport driving pleasure and spend accordingly. Some have overcome intense dislike of the exterior design to make the switch. I think the trend should be interesting to those who have yet to test drive the new car.
I am one of those migrants and no regrets so far
Appreciate 2
02M3ForMe4267.50
VIERsr2623.00
      06-02-2021, 12:07 PM   #16
VIERsr
Major
Switzerland
2623
Rep
1,477
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zurich

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 02M3ForMe View Post
In this review, the G8x was praised for its “fun factor” and “turning pleasure” despite the noted understeer (which must be at the limit since I have yet to feel it on the street). These are 2021 impressions contextualized by 2021 expectations; we all know the F8x was a great car for its time. In 2014, we were all impressed.

Contrary to the speculation, the bigger, heavier G8x is sharper, grippier, and more agile than the F8x. Far from a “mini M5”, the new M3/4 is as close to the benchmark 911 as any generation has ever gotten.

Anecdotally, we’re seeing several M2C -> G8x migrants. Most consciously passed over the bigger, more powerful F80/82 to get at the M2C’s significantly better handling. These are the folks who really care about sport driving pleasure and spend accordingly. Some have overcome intense dislike of the exterior design to make the switch. I think the trend should be interesting to those who have yet to test drive the new car.
Just by reading the spec sheet, you would really be led to think that the new M3 is really a mini M5 and far from the old M2/3/4, then you drive it and realize how damn fun, fast and engaging it is! And how far it is from the 'soulless rocket' conception of the M5.
People should drive the cars before talking about them
Appreciate 1
02M3ForMe4267.50
      06-02-2021, 01:45 PM   #17
mn_bmw
Private
71
Rep
53
Posts

Drives: 2021 M3 Manual RWD
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Minneapolis, MN

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VIERsr View Post
Just by reading the spec sheet, you would really be led to think that the new M3 is really a mini M5 and far from the old M2/3/4, then you drive it and realize how damn fun, fast and engaging it is! And how far it is from the 'soulless rocket' conception of the M5.
People should drive the cars before talking about them
100% agree. My G80 feels nothing like the M5 I test drove before deciding to go with the M3.
Appreciate 0
      06-02-2021, 08:15 PM   #18
PLF69
Colonel
PLF69's Avatar
3770
Rep
2,700
Posts

Drives: 2023 M3
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Quebec

iTrader: (0)

I find funny some comparison I find on M3/M4 specific forums, does the 3 series feel like a 5 series ? No so why would the M3 feel like an M5...

It's like M3/M4 buyers or commenters never drove the regular series cars lol
__________________
Fun/HPDE: 2023 M3 6MT Individual Malachite
Past:2023 M4 CSL, 2022 M4C Vert, 2020 M340i, 2018 M2, 2015 M235i, 2008 135i 550whp
Daily: 2023 X5 45e
Daily/Family: 2021 Atlas Cross Sport 3.6
Appreciate 1
      06-04-2021, 12:47 AM   #19
VIERsr
Major
Switzerland
2623
Rep
1,477
Posts

Drives: BMW M2
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Zurich

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
By Motortrend
Quote:
Popular internet opinion says the new M3 is now really an M5. The reality is that's in the M5's dreams. Aside from the fact that the G80 M3 is more than 400 pounds lighter than the current F90 M5, the G80 M3 is also around 200 pounds lighter than the legendary E39 M5. Even the 311-hp E34 M5 weighs 100 pounds more than this car. No M5 has ever felt this fleet, this exact, this sporting. Sorry, internet, but that's the truth. Sure, the original 282-hp E28 M5 was much lighter, but that one had nowhere near this sort of power-to-weight ratio. No, the G80 M3 is something else entirely.
Appreciate 3
02M3ForMe4267.50
CanAutM321125.00
EXE462101.50
      06-04-2021, 08:25 AM   #20
EXE46
Lieutenant Colonel
EXE46's Avatar
United_States
2102
Rep
1,533
Posts

Drives: 2020 M340i RWD Aka New E39 M5
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: State of Dystopia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLF69 View Post
I find funny some comparison I find on M3/M4 specific forums, does the 3 series feel like a 5 series ? No so why would the M3 feel like an M5...

It's like M3/M4 buyers or commenters never drove the regular series cars lol
Bingo! I drive a 3 series and would never in a million years consider a current or modern 5 series. 3 series is as big a car I will ever need or want to drive. These cars appeal to opposite demographics.

Today's 5'er is a land yacht and they drive nothing like the the old 5 series most of us knew. On the other hand, a 2 series is always a likely contender again due to its size and agility.
__________________
Prior's: E36, E46 x2
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.




g80
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST