|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
So why don't they make carbon fiber driveshafts for us?
|
|
12-16-2008, 08:27 AM | #2 |
Drives Smart
54
Rep 2,393
Posts |
Cause we don't need it and these cars aren't performance oriented enough...I guess.
__________________
08 BMW ///M5 Space Gray/Black 6 speed Engine: RPi GTS exhaust, RPi Scoops, Carbon Filter Delete Exterior: Glossy Black Kidneys, LUX V3, OEM LED License Plate light, Bruce License Plate Adapter |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2008, 10:18 AM | #3 |
just another bmw douche bag
195
Rep 3,640
Posts |
while carbon fiber is very light and strong, it is also very brittle compared to steel. I'm not sure I'd want to replace a major drive train component (like the driveshaft) with CF on a daily driven vehicle. Parts like that will need to be checked (and even replaced) much more often than an oem steel part.
I've seen pictures of a failed CF driveshaft, and it had literally splintered and exploded into thousands of pieces. didn't look pretty. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2008, 09:55 PM | #5 |
New Member
1
Rep 25
Posts |
^ You're right, but losing my weight, wouldn't that be considered static weight opposed to the driveshaft's unsprung weight. Which overall should be more effective. I'm guessing the drive shaft is considered unsprung in this case, am i right?
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2008, 10:08 PM | #6 |
just another bmw douche bag
195
Rep 3,640
Posts |
no, the drive shaft is considered sprung weight because all the parts it attaches to are fixed to the chassis, which is suspended by the suspension (hence, sprung). only things that are not supported by the suspension are unsprung (wheels, tires, brakes, hubs, etc).
what you are probably thinking about is a CF driveshaft will have less rotational inertia than a steel one, so it *may* allow for quicker acceleration (sort of like a lightened flywheel effect). but how much is hard to say, since the driveshaft has a very small diameter compared to something like a flywheel, so inertia is going to be a lot less than something like a large wheel and tire. and realistically, when you weigh in the cost and risk of failure, it's probably not worth it. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2008, 10:39 PM | #7 |
Gixxer Man
14
Rep 599
Posts |
+1 Very good explanation...
Just get lighter wheels. Its cheaper and easier to do
__________________
Stable: 2008 E90 335i JB3 etc..., 2006 Range Rover HSE, K7 GSX-R 600
Former Stable: 2008 MB C300, 2007 Chevy Avalanche, 2006 Evo IX (544awhp), 2005 Sti, 2003 Evo... |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|