02-21-2010, 02:58 PM | #1 |
Moderator
589
Rep 4,240
Posts |
The reason the C6 scares me
Mods are CAI, long tube headers, Corsa Z06 exhaust, and tune. I clocked it at 100mph in about 8sec.
__________________
- 04 Honda S2000(gone)
|
02-21-2010, 04:42 PM | #7 |
Major General
156
Rep 5,497
Posts |
+1 hopefully he comes back to the thread to explain.
__________________
2007 E92 Montego Blue 335i
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 04:53 PM | #9 |
Brigadier General
127
Rep 4,971
Posts |
Cool vid - There is a member on this board that also has a C6 Z06, but he has done quite a bit more to it than the mods mentioned above. His makes that one sound like a civic.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 04:56 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant Colonel
636
Rep 1,753
Posts |
I always thought that M3's were world class handling machines (from media stories/people talking about them) until I owned one. What the M3 does well is stay composed when pushed hard and stay pretty neutral w/o understeer/oversteer. In that sense , yeah the M3 handles well
BUT..... The center of gravity is too high and the M3 leans too much in corners, it weighs too much, and its limits are not all that great. I have not driven a C6, but I got very spoiled in my C5 Z06. the C5 Z06 does 1.06g STOCK, stays very flat in corners, and is also very neutral. I can only imagine that the C6 handles just as good as a C5 Z06. The only thing lacking in the handling dept. on the Corvettes is the back-end can kick out a little with uneven pavement, nothing a shock upgrade can't resolve though. I don't know why people still live in the past with Corvettes. They are no longer straight line machines anymore. From the C5 era on, Corvettes not only rival that of Euro cars, they surpasses them. Even with RE-11 tires my stock M3 does not come close to the handling limits that my C5 Z06 had.
__________________
18? Camaro 2SS 1LE
16' M3 MG Ext. /SO Int. (DCT, Ohlin R/T, 19" wheels) 15' Audi S4 13' Audi TTRS (APR stage 1, MSS springs) 09' C6 Z06 08' M3 Interlagos Blue: 6sp, Tech. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 05:06 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant General
10318
Rep 14,445
Posts |
Yep. You can't get that sound just anywhere.
The Grand Sport is supposedly the best of all worlds. Less harsh, less skippy into hard corners and just a tick slower than the Z06. Even with it's metal frame, only 100lbs heavier than the Z06' aluminum, that rascal will scoot and handle like hell. All with basically the same looks as the Z06. With manual you get the oil sump too. Too bad they are asking the same as new Z06' clearance sales. That will wear off though. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 05:11 PM | #14 |
Colonel
53
Rep 2,359
Posts |
Compared to what, an F1 car? You are dumb if you think any current BMW handles as well as even a standard C6 Vette.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 05:23 PM | #15 |
Colonel
313
Rep 2,576
Posts |
I wasn't surprised by the C6 comment. There are far too many folks that are blind to reality on these forums, thinking that BMW is the end all be all of performance cars. The C6 is a remarkable platform for performance. BMW make great all around cars, but certainly not superior in all out performance.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 05:29 PM | #16 | |
Captain
188
Rep 962
Posts |
Quote:
it amuses me the amount of stupid comments that people make in this forum sometimes.... especially pertaining to the c6.... Any c6 conversation seems to always brings out some ignoramus |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 05:40 PM | #17 | |
I am Gundam
197
Rep 1,211
Posts |
Quote:
" It's an ancient OHV pushrod V8" When in fact the age difference between OHV and DOHC is only ~10 years. DOHC isn't anything new. It is just it became more widely used when the Japanese entered the US market. " It uses leaf springs as its rear suspension" Someone else will have to post the reason why it uses the leaf spring as I forgot and a quick search on wiki doesn't say. " Typical American Engineering. Can only get HP from a huge displacement V8" Frankly, who cares that GM uses a 6.2 V8 to make 436 HP? It gets respectable fuel economy and makes great power. Also, the LS3 physically is smaller then the small displacement V8's making similar HP. Mercedes's 6.2 V8 is guaranteed physically bigger then the LS3. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 06:19 PM | #19 |
Captain
85
Rep 812
Posts
Drives: 2009 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 Sedan
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Simons Island, GA
|
I love the C6. I think alot of the detractors just watch too much Top Gear and Jeremy Clarkson. Here's some news for you: Just because Clarkson makes fun of the leaf springs doesn't mean they don't work...
__________________
2013 Lexus GS 350 F-Sport Starfire Pearl/Flaxen w/nav
2009 Hyundai Genesis 3.8 sedan Sapphire/Tan w/nav 1997 Ford Expedition Eddie Bauer |
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 08:13 PM | #20 | |
Major
358
Rep 1,149
Posts |
Quote:
What I'm trying to explain is these cars don't have the sophistication their european rivals have. They get the job done, but not gracefully. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 08:39 PM | #21 | |
I am Gundam
197
Rep 1,211
Posts |
Quote:
So the sophistication reason is pure Grade A BS. You just use it to further keep the image of the Europeans being better then the Americans. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2010, 08:49 PM | #22 | |
Captain
18
Rep 739
Posts |
Quote:
You do the same to M3 motor or even Nissan's VQ motor and then compare the gains to LS3. Just because chevy decided to put out 400hp out of 6.2L doesn't mean it's anywhere near its max potential.
__________________
03 Golf TDI w/ r32 conversion - 120bph/40mpg ftw for now..
06 Evo IX MR - 500whp,,,sold..... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|