[BroDoze]

RTA’d the car. Know my way around all of that whole thing now.

I used the default house curve. Blech. Too flat in the midrange. Need to come up with my own house curve - take the edge off in the 1k-5k range. That’ll be next step.

Starting to sound like a tuned car now!

[BMW DIY Guy]

Done! All the crossover filters are out!

[BroDoze]

That’s a lot of work right there! ^^

Notice any difference in sound?

[BMW DIY Guy]

Originally Posted by BroDoze

That’s a lot of work right there! ^^

Notice any difference in sound?

Not yet but no testing time either as it was the third car project of the day, and wanted to wrap up.

[kenkamm]

Originally Posted by BroDoze

RTA’d the car. Know my way around all of that whole thing now.

I used the default house curve. Blech. Too flat in the midrange. Need to come up with my own house curve - take the edge off in the 1k-5k range. That’ll be next step.

Starting to sound like a tuned car now!

BroDoze I'm intensely curious to see your curves! Did you notice the same gaping hole between between 80 hz and 160hz?

[kenkamm]

Originally Posted by AdonisP91

No need for the Resonix box. We can achieve digital lossless audio for 20$. There are sacrifices, as always. If you connect a spdif usb to optical adapter to your phone and run an optical cable to the DSP, you now have digital sound but no more system sounds. I am fine with that. I see my blinkers on the dash and other warnings on the idrive display.

See, I am looking at it from the other side of the coin. Having to switch between two source methods depending on what kind of drive I am going on, perhaps not having my "best" sound on shorter drives, missing system sounds on longer drives, all of that has me thinking we could organize a group buy for the Resonix alternative that's like 300 bucks. We only need 3 people to buy in.

If we can't reasonably compensate for this newly discovered -10 dB dip around 100-120 Hz with some EQ (maybe bring it up to -5 or even -3 dB), I would be seriously tempted to buy one of these decoder boxes if we could organize a group buy. The challenge then would be, configuring the DSP PC tool!

[AdonisP91]

Originally Posted by kenkamm

See, I am looking at it from the other side of the coin. Having to switch between two source methods depending on what kind of drive I am going on, perhaps not having my "best" sound on shorter drives, missing system sounds on longer drives, all of that has me thinking we could organize a group buy for the Resonix alternative that's like 300 bucks. We only need 3 people to buy in.

If we can't reasonably compensate for this newly discovered -10 dB dip around 100-120 Hz with some EQ (maybe bring it up to -5 or even -3 dB), I would be seriously tempted to buy one of these decoder boxes if we could organize a group buy. The challenge then would be, configuring the DSP PC tool!

Ok just for the sake of clarity. Why do people want this box? If it is so they hope they can manually change the crossovers, I think I will be able to fix the analog input signal in EQ. So no need on that front. Also the DSP PC tool doesn’t worry me it is extremely nice to work with and integrates with REW seemlessly.

If it is because they want a digital signal to play lossless files from a USB drive while bypassing all the Logic 7 processing, ok fine. If they want to stream lossless directly from the Tidal app in the car without Logic 7 messing things up, fine. That works too.

If you want to stream lossless Apple Music while still connected to CarPlay, we still have to connect the spdif cable to the iPhone.

But yes, having the system sounds while using the digital signal is a massive win. I am definitely down to try a bulk buy with others, but as I mentioned it is untested waters, so we have to all be clear on the risk.

As for the dip, I am extremely skeptical we can fix this just from playing with some crossovers. We might be able to mitigate it a bit, but I think the problem is down to the speaker locations. I don’t think BMW sound engineers are so incompetent they wouldn’t just change the crossovers or filters if they could. The issue is they have to work with the constraints given to them regarding where the subwoofer, midrange speaker, and tweeters go.

That’s also why the Bowers & Wilkins didn’t improve anything, the speakers are under the same constraints. However, that doesn’t mean we don’t have tricks or solutions we can try.

Changing the crossovers, playing with the phase, might help reduce the dip a bit, and if we don’t want to relocate all the speakers, and I certainly don’t, I want to keep the OEM look, there are other tricks we can work with in the EQ.

[kenkamm]

Originally Posted by AdonisP91

Ok just for the sake of clarity. Why do people want this box? If it is so they hope they can manually change the crossovers, I think I will be able to fix the analog input signal in EQ. So no need on that front.

The reason I would want the box is from looking at the input signals from the HK system that were posted earlier and noting that there seemed to be a big hole between the mid bass high-pass and the subwoofer low-pass. If that is real data, then (1) I don't know why BMW would do that, and (2) we can't change it. The solution would then be to get ahead of it.

[AdonisP91]

Originally Posted by kenkamm

The reason I would want the box is from looking at the input signals from the HK system that were posted earlier and noting that there seemed to be a big hole between the mid bass high-pass and the subwoofer low-pass. If that is real data, then (1) I don't know why BMW would do that, and (2) we can't change it. The solution would then be to get ahead of it.

Right on. I agree we might see big improvements just getting back control of the input signal. Let’s see what happens when I run sweeps comparing analog vs digital and how tuneable the analog input signal is. I think Tom mentioned he would try running the Auto EQ in the Advanced Input Analyzer when the weather warms up as well. It’ll be interesting to see how that works too.