07-30-2014, 09:16 AM | #1 |
Major General
5502
Rep 8,833
Posts |
Anyone test drive the F15 with DHP, Adaptive M and Base suspension?
Chances are finding a dealer with all three different suspension is going to be tough around where I live. I am just curious to see if anyone test drove the DHP over the adaptive M suspension to see what was noticeably different between the two.
The adaptive M suspension doesn't have air suspension in the back does it? I thought i remember hearing that back in the E70 days most of the issues with that truck had to do with the suspension. I don't want to get it if its going to increase my chances of multiple dealership visits if i get the F15 next. Alan
__________________
|
07-30-2014, 10:52 AM | #2 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 163
Posts |
DHP has ARS and DPC Adaptive M sport has not.
EDIT: Only base suspension does not have a rear air axle Last edited by lovec1990; 07-30-2014 at 11:23 AM.. Reason: aditional data |
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 07:27 AM | #3 |
Major
615
Rep 1,133
Posts |
Check on these forums and bimmerfest I saw a post a couple weeks back that had a chart that showed the highlights of each suspension compared with each other. We test drove the basic suspension and it was comparable to our 2012 M Sport suspension, except the F15 was a lot more compliant on bumps. We opted for the adaptive M since it has the rear air bags. Which will give a better ride and keep the vehicle level during towing. We're close to $80k on this build and couldn't justify another $3500.
__________________
It's good to be bad
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-31-2014, 07:32 AM | #4 |
Major
254
Rep 1,067
Posts
Drives: 2017 M3 ZCP / 2017 RRS SC
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Naperville
|
I have had adaptive suspension on every e70 and never once had an issue with air bags
__________________
17 M3 ZCP -- 2017 Range Rover Sport SC --RIP-- 12 X5 50i Sport -- 11 M3 DCT -- 2011 X5 50i(Lemon) -- 2008 550 Msport -- 2007 x5 4.8 sport -- 2004 545 sport -- 2002 x5 4.4 sport -- 2001 540i Msport 2000 SL500 -- 1997 SL500 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2014, 08:31 PM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
43
Rep 258
Posts |
Can someone with DHP and Conti DWS non-RFs all season 20's comment how the ride is when DHP is set to comfort? Is there any jarring feeling when riding over bumps? I am hoping the non-RFs soften the ride up a bit. My guess is the 20 with non-rf will have a similar ride quality (bump smoothing ability) to an X5 with 19" rf. Do you all agree?
I do not have my X5 yet, but I do plan on taking the rfs off immediately. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2014, 10:36 PM | #7 |
Private
3
Rep 51
Posts |
contis vs pirelli's
The Conti's will give a softer more compliant ride. The difference is not that great. Only noticeable difference is in hard cornering where the P-Zero's are much more stable. I think BMW has really improved their chasis tuning with run flats the last several years. Temps and snow dictate I make a change to all-seasons-wish I didn't have to.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2014, 10:56 PM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
43
Rep 258
Posts |
Thanks.
I welcome the slightly softer ride. I would keep the rf summer tires on, but 8000-10,000 mile before replacement is needed is unacceptable to me...especially at $2,000 a set. The all seasons are half the cost and last many times longer. The DWS will be great to leave on when I am in between seasons or for freak early/late season snow storms, which often occur in New England. I have also ordered a dedicated winter set of tires and wheels for mid-December through March. Last edited by SUV55; 11-03-2014 at 11:02 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant
110
Rep 525
Posts |
i will say that with DHP, AIR, Adaptive MSuspension, the ride is immensely changed over the stock x5 without any suspension options. now i test drove two cars, the one i own with all the suspension options, and a non msport with no suspension options. the difference was night and day.
being more comfortable and able to soak the bumps, as well as tightening up like a brick in sport mode. the options available to this X5 model year, make it the best handling suv i have ever experienced. ive been in my neighbors 2014 cayenne turbo with some suspension options, and although it was extremely tight...the ride was smoother and comfortably agile in the bmw over the cayenne....let alone it cost $140K
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 01:25 PM | #10 | |
Colonel
357
Rep 2,190
Posts |
Quote:
I just picked up my X5 xDrive50i a few weeks ago with the M adaptive suspension. The M adaptive suspension is essentially the same thing as the "Dynamic Damper control + rear axle air suspension" except with sportier tuning. You also get Sport+ instead of Comfort+ with the M adaptive suspension over the standard DDC. The ride is great, the car remains very flat and does not float at all. Cornering you can also feel the car firm up. Very good value in my opinion ($900 if you have M-sport). The DHP in my opinion is not really worth it. The X5 with the M Adaptive Suspension is sporty enough as is, there's really no need for DHP unless you want to autoross/track your X5. Hope this helps. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 01:29 PM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
1331
Rep 3,990
Posts |
Quote:
DHP is wonderful for what it is and like you said, if you're really a stickler for having a tighter feel like me, then it's needed. Otherwise, the M-Suspension is plenty sporty and tight and definitely worth it for only $900 upgrade.
__________________
2014 X5 50i X-Line // Mineral White
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 02:01 PM | #12 | |
Captain
149
Rep 666
Posts |
Quote:
I've driven several F15s off the lot with the MAdaptive suspension (but no DHP). There is a very swervy street that is right by my dealer that I use to test the car's swerve-ability. In my opinion after having two Xs with adaptive drive (MSport+anti-roll), the F15 w/MSport is not flat. You can stiffen it up so you don't get that Town Car feeling, but the body roll is definitely apparent. MSport helps with movement the sagittal axis (up and down) Anti-roll helps with movement on the transverse axis (lateral/sideways body roll) The torque-vectoring DPC helps keep the car on track If you don't like body-roll, then you'll want DHP. If you don't care (or you don't $3500 care), then don't. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 02:12 PM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
1331
Rep 3,990
Posts |
Quote:
For the value and what you get, the M-suspension is good enough for many. For something even remotely close to a tight X5M/X6M feel, DHP is a must, esp if you have the 50i models. That's my two cents from my experiences.
__________________
2014 X5 50i X-Line // Mineral White
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 03:03 PM | #14 |
Captain
149
Rep 666
Posts |
I wish I could come up with some reason that a 50i is a must for DHP. You know that if I could convince my fiscally irresponsible self of that, I'd be all over a 50i! For now I'm going to have to resign myself to being jealous
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2014, 03:06 PM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
1331
Rep 3,990
Posts |
Quote:
This is also why I'm looking into upgrading to Accuair air suspension in a few months. I need that better feel .
__________________
2014 X5 50i X-Line // Mineral White
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
11-04-2014, 04:41 PM | #16 |
Four stripes vehicle commander
159
Rep 206
Posts |
Although I am very OK with the std. suspension (I don't know better...)
I am sure my next vehicle (If an X5/X6) will have: 7SZ Adaptive Suspension Includes: - 2VM Adaptive suspension Comfort - 2VP Adaptive suspension Dynamic Cheers, Bent |
Appreciate
1
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|