|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-01-2019, 04:50 AM | #1 |
Captain
528
Rep 855
Posts |
Rear Spring rate difference between true coilover and stock setup
Hi Guys,
Just wondering if anyone has the actual conversion ratio between a true rear coilover setup and the stock rear spring mounting option. For instance what would an 800# spring rate on the rear stock control arm location equate to on a true rear coilover? I've heard about 0.55 when going from stock to true coilover but I wanted to hear from the forum members if there is an actual real ratio (calculated) noted somewhere by a suspension company. Thanks, Steve |
06-05-2019, 07:31 AM | #2 |
Second Lieutenant
145
Rep 210
Posts |
This thread should get you going in the right direction - https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1573051
You need to know the motion ration of the suspension, then apply that to the spring rate.
__________________
2012 Space Grey 128i
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2019, 01:00 PM | #3 |
Captain
528
Rep 855
Posts |
This doesn't really answer my question. The thread you describe is for the stock spring location on the rear and corresponding motion ratio.
I need to know the motion ratio for the true rear coilover setup. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2019, 02:23 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
362
Rep 518
Posts |
The M4 GT4 race car has rear coil overs and lists 3 optional spring rates of 150, 170, 190lb. Significantly softer in the outboard shock location compared with the stock spring location.
Front spring rates list 180, 200, 220lb and that's about right with stock spring rates. Last edited by RevNev; 06-05-2019 at 02:32 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2019, 06:49 PM | #5 | |
Major General
2401
Rep 5,852
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-05-2019, 11:54 PM | #6 |
Lieutenant
362
Rep 518
Posts |
Their running 1200lb springs in the front of an already stiff car with stock springs of 185lbs. That's double the spring rate found in a McPherson strut cast iron engine V8 race car that's nose heavy. You sure it's N/mm?
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2019, 04:44 AM | #7 | |
First Lieutenant
143
Rep 321
Posts |
Quote:
Here are the part numbers and specs https://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/sho...diagId=33_2166 Ohlins is a european company, and would exclusively use metric measurements. They would not use imperial measurements, and certainly would not mix metric and imperial For example 170-60-150. Is 170mm length, 60mm inner diameter and 150 is the spring rate. That has to be 150 n/mm, which is plausible, being 856lbs. That is the softest rear, the stiffest 190 is 1084 lbs. Seems about right to me, based on what I know people are running on other marque GT4 cars on smooth european racetracks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2019, 04:51 AM | #8 | |
Major General
2401
Rep 5,852
Posts |
Quote:
I’m running F/R 600/900 lbf/in springs (non-coilover R) with MCS 2WR dampers and it’s amazingly comfortable on the street. My setup is biased toward the street. My R56 Mini Cooper S with Ohlins R&T dampers (coilover setup F and R) runs higher spring rates than 180-220 lbf/in (300 lbf/in) and it’s on the softer side. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-06-2019, 10:32 AM | #9 | |
Lieutenant
362
Rep 518
Posts |
Quote:
I'd say racing an M4 on slicks on Australian tracks about 400lb in the front would be good start. I can't see optimum lap times in the GT4 front spring rates on our race tracks. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-07-2019, 04:40 AM | #10 | |
Major General
2401
Rep 5,852
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
bbnks21208.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|