|
|
|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-11-2010, 09:00 AM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
124
Rep 371
Posts |
Premium Audio- Opinions from home-audio (audiophiles) guys
I am an audio guy. I mean a home-audio guy (Linn LP12 w/ Lingo, Alphason Benz Ruby, Conrad-Johnson and Paoli vacuum tube electronics, Montana, Audioquest, etc.).
I have come to accept that there are different expectations between home-audio guys and car-audio guys with respect to audio system performance. For example, there is no expectation of imaging with car audio, whereas imaging is critical with home-audio. Here is where I stand. Compared to good home audio systems, car audio is a huge compromise. I listened to the Enhanced Premium system in the M3. It was good, but a paled in comparison to any good home system I have ever heard. The dealer did not have an M3 with the base system for comparison. I decided to order my car with the standard audio system. With my home audio system as my reference my justification is that the Enhanced system was just a different flavor of compromise and did not warrant $1900 for a flavor change. So, for all the home-audio guys in here; what is your opinion of the Enhanced Premium sound system in the M3? Last edited by Dave2; 12-11-2010 at 03:19 PM.. |
12-11-2010, 09:19 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
394
Rep 3,161
Posts |
If you are an audiophile, There is only 1 system that sounds good in any car and that is the Jaguar Audyssey based system. That is the only car that has a good sounding system. The BMW premium system is in no way audiophile. Is it worth it? Not at all but i still got it so that it will get me by for a few months before i install my sound system upgrades.
__________________
2015 M3 BPM Tuned, Eibach, Magnaflow and more www.tmrmzine.com/m3/f80
SOLD E92 Slēk Carbon Fiber Widebody M3 www.tmrmzine.com/m3/slek/ SOLD E92 335i Stage 3+ with all the toys www.tmrmzine.com/335/ SOLD E39 M5 Modded, What a great car! www.tmrmzine.com/m5/ |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 10:13 AM | #3 | |
Major
376
Rep 1,223
Posts |
Quote:
Car audio systems by their nature are a compromise, due in part to their hostile listening environment, tiny room size and constant changes due to variable passenger load, etc. In the M3, it is also in particular not a living room on wheels by design and although an expensive option, it is cheaper then any custom install which would require much work and money to begin to resemble a good home system. The M3 convertible faces even more demanding requirements as it needs to fight against even worse sound conditions (as well as that sweet engine which seems to like to try and drown out anything else if asked). Whether the premium option is worth the extra money is debatable as it is in every car which offers an upgrade, but the bar to determine the quality of a stock car system compared to a home system with high end components has to be lower. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 10:16 AM | #4 |
collecting toys
41
Rep 810
Posts |
The base system is not very good and the premium system is a notable upgrade from that. You might be able to get the premium system and use its additional and bigger speaker locations, etc. as a better starting point for a further upgrade.
__________________
2011 e92 M3 Monte Carlo Blue ESS 535 - gone but not forgotten
2015 cayman GTS - new toy 2006 SLK 55 AMG sold |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 10:23 AM | #5 |
Brigadier General
849
Rep 3,274
Posts |
I have ordered 4 new BMWs, a 323i, 2 E46 M3s, and soon to be E92, and I would NEVER order a BMW without upgraded audio. The stock system sucks IMO
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 11:33 AM | #6 |
Banned
707
Rep 1,908
Posts |
BMW is the ultimate driving machine, not listening machine. I'm sure the standard system is fine. Maybe not by aftermarket standards, but c'mon. And no one explained why it sucks in detail.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 11:40 AM | #7 |
Brigadier General
849
Rep 3,274
Posts |
I don't know if that frankly is possible. It's about listening.
In the E46 the difference between premium and regular was VERY noticeable. I haven't had a chance to compare side to side in the E9x. It's like, you may look at a girl and think she is sexy, and I may not think she is sexy. You may listen to the stock system and think it is fine, whereas I do not. If you're paying for this car, you should be able to afford it whether you buy the car stripped, or loaded. In that case, premium audio is a no brainer for me.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 12:31 PM | #8 |
octane chick
81
Rep 1,187
Posts
Drives: ex-M
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
|
To me, it was premium audio or no audio. I was not about to entertain an after-market solution on a brand new car. (I'm leasing, but assuming I have a good 3 years I'll likely buy, and maybe then I'd consider some more aggressive mods, but even then I'm not figuring I'll replace the premium audio system. It has a clean sound that works for rock, jazz and talk (news, books on tape), and the little I've listened to reggae it bumped fine to my taste. Haven't tried classical yet; it doesn't seem to fit the mood of the M3 driving experience.
Mind you, I'm not one of those people who need to vibrate the car loose with a womb of superbass subwoofer volume. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 12:33 PM | #9 |
Banned
707
Rep 1,908
Posts |
Being able to afford doesn't mean one spends carelessly. Again, this thread fails to address the measurable differences between the two systems. Often times when one has deep pockets, they assume more expensive equals better. If the real issue with these systems is perception and/or preference, let's leave it at that, because that has more to do with taste, not actual mechanical innerworkings.
BTW I'm really interested in the differences. Not defending either system. Last edited by 48Laws; 12-11-2010 at 12:49 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 12:53 PM | #10 |
Major
128
Rep 1,144
Posts |
For me, it was a no brainer to go with Enhanced audio. I had no intentions of fighting with car to get a reasonable aftermarket system in it this time around. The base audio is basically no audio - it's that bad.
I went the aftermarket route on my old E46 (Dynaudio w/ time alignment, a nice sub, and ~1500w of power) on top of the embarrassingly terrible H/K upgrade, and while I was really happy with the results, it added nearly 80lbs to the car that I had to remove each time I went to the track (sub and amps were in a removable module). Enhanced audio on the E9XM3 is pretty good as car systems go, save for the bass extension/punch and factory EQ tune and there is a gap in the 100-200Hz range that the 4" mids just can't deal with. You can get close to good by tweaking the eq and getting the SWS subs and gaining control over the relative bass levels and tuning to get the volume higher and the extension lower. Never going to touch an audiophile system - I have never experienced a car audio system that comes close to a nice home system - the car environment is just far too difficult to manage - even having spent 7K+ on the best equipment, fabrication, and tuning available when I was young and stupid. Our CEO recently let me drive his Panamera Turbo with the Burmester audio upgrade. It's pretty good, but, still, not worth the 10K upgrade compared to what you could achieve with aftermarket equipment and power. It lacks bass extension as well - though the clarity, response, and sound-stage above 70Hz was very good parked with CD source. Some people would choose to hack up the car and install an aftermarket system - and say they could do better than the Burmester system. I would just get the upgrade. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2010, 05:14 PM | #13 | |
Brigadier General
849
Rep 3,274
Posts |
Quote:
Nice post, thanks!
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2010, 05:54 PM | #15 | |
First Lieutenant
20
Rep 329
Posts |
Quote:
See the thread below. I listened to this car for a bit and it sounded VERY impressive and leaps and bounds better than the Enhanced Premium Sound and at a similar cost - especially considering there was no trunk space lost or large box used for a subwoofer. I spent far more than that on my system with Don and while I was willing to pay for that incremental sound quality, if cost is a factor, B-737's system is a no brainer. Plus no cutting so you can revert back to stock at sale and probably recover as much as you would if you had gone with the upgraded sound. http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=451762 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2010, 05:58 PM | #16 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
525
Rep 1,440
Posts |
Base audio is a mistake. I always get the enhanced audio as i never want to do anything aftermarket to the audio. Exhaust, wheels, yes. Audio, no.
__________________
2022 Individual M5 Comp
Venetian Violet 2021 X6M Comp 2024 i4 M50 on order IG @purpleM5Comp_NY |
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 01:53 AM | #17 | |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Quote:
If I was keeping my M I'd have already done my install (MS-8, Morel drivers, JL amps, Stereo Integrity sub) instead of leaving it all on a shelf in my garage. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 07:28 AM | #18 |
My master volume goes to 11
59
Rep 467
Posts |
I am upgrading my EP Sound woofers with the SWS8 this week. JB Audio amp. Technic's LOC.
Now, as to whether EP is worth it. FOr me, it is 1000% yes. I have had my 09 for almost 2 years. I crank the stereo regularly. Although it could use that low end help, it is listenable and not bad. I listen to fusion and jazz. No hip hop or stuff like that. But, a lot of fusion has crisp six string bass with low B and well miced powerful drums. Really taxes the system. It is clear and there is little distortion. The regular base system is junk. Unlistenable where I have been listening. So, for me, the EP is a big improvement over the base system altenative. I'll report back how she sounds after the sub upgrade.
__________________
1987 Buick Grand National, 2009 BMW E90 M3, 2016 Audi S6, 2018 MB E63S AMG, currently in 2021 M5 Competition
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-15-2010, 01:29 PM | #20 |
Brigadier General
289
Rep 3,201
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|