|
|
03-29-2011, 11:41 PM | #1 |
New Member
10
Rep 20
Posts |
question about rpm
Hey guys. I just got an new e92 m3. White, fox red/carbon fiber trim leater, 6MT, and with all pkgs. It's an awesome beast and I really really love it.
Now I just did the 1200 miles service and it's much faster! I have a question is that my m3 is only going around 72mph at 3000 rpm in 6th gear. It that normal? Even my 335i before was going 95-100 mph at 3000rpm. My friends' G37 is also around 95mph. Is it normal at 72mph with 3000rpm with an e92 m3? |
03-29-2011, 11:46 PM | #2 |
Major
167
Rep 1,159
Posts |
I'm no expert but I can tell you from what I personally think which may be totally irrelevant. But remember that this is a high performance engine, where as the other engines that you are stating are not. The M3's engine is designed to rev freely, hence the 8400rpm redline. The other cars that you are mentioning have a redline of around 6700rpm. Hope this helps, and I hope I am right!
__________________
M3.E90 JZB Coded.GTSDCT.BomizValved.TurnerTestPipes.ResDelete .EurochargedTune.AAFilter.HRER40s
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 12:45 AM | #4 |
Porn Star
1316
Rep 3,350
Posts |
this is 100% normal! They all rev high, sucks a little for gas mileage, but whuddayagonnado, right?
I like how fast I can go in third!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 12:52 AM | #5 | |
Major
215
Rep 1,395
Posts |
Quote:
NICE SIG Tanglewood. Third gear is the sh!t...
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 01:02 AM | #6 |
Major General
258
Rep 5,012
Posts |
Exactly 72 mph at 3K rpm on my '08 as well, so nothing has changed . Wish it was a lot higher too, but there's nothing we can do. Car would be a lot better with gas. With the ridiculously high rpm and ridiculously small gas tank, this car SUCKS for travel, but that's what I mostly use it for. Oh well. Just hope gas doesn't keep going up .
Last edited by JCtx; 03-30-2011 at 09:58 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 10:28 AM | #7 |
that's what SHE said!
75
Rep 1,163
Posts |
Yes it's normal, and is also the same reason why the "low end torque" argument of the 335i holds no merit. The other two cars you mentioned run lower rpm, but also have a MUCH shorter rpm range.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 10:55 AM | #8 |
Colonel
87
Rep 2,464
Posts |
I never understood why BMW is using such short ratios for 6th (or 7th in dct)? Is there any track in the world where you want short ratio on 6th gear? Or any canyon road? Would be nice to cruise at 2krpm @ 70mph.
__________________
2011 MINI Cooper S
previous cars: E92 M3, Z4MC, Z4 Roadster, E36 328 Sedan |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 10:58 AM | #9 |
Lieutenant Colonel
171
Rep 1,530
Posts |
The day I need 7th on a track would be the most exciting driving day for me..!!!
__________________
2011 E92 JB/BL/DCT--->80K Miles
2015 F80 SS/SO/DCT?->28K Miles 2015 Porsche 911S |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 11:21 AM | #10 | |
Colonel
99
Rep 2,000
Posts |
Quote:
After trading in our '93 LT-1 six-speed Vette on our first M3 (a '95), the throttle response and available acceleration in top gear was a revelation and a delight. Yes, the Vette was a bunch faster than the bimmer (by a full second in the quarter mile, stock to stock), but it was a real slug in top gear until you got up to near 100 or so. The M3 was not only willing, but eager in top gear at highway speeds. The current model is even better in that regard. It also seems pretty comfy and quiet at 3500 - 4000 rpm. No vibration or anything. Just effortless speed. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 12:47 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant General
928
Rep 15,818
Posts |
hmm i don't think i rev at 3k when I'm only going 70... i think that's more around 80?
maybe the 7th gear in the DCT? I haven't been on the freeway in a little while (well, at least one that was moving past 30mph, stupid LA traffic) next time I'm on when it's open I'll check it out
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 01:54 PM | #12 |
Enlisted Member
2
Rep 41
Posts |
That's normal.
My M3 hits 3,000+ RPM at 65 mph since this has a high rev limit. I had a Honda S2000 with a similar high rev limit that also cruises at that RPM. Don't worry about wear and tear here. These engines are happy(partying) at that RPM.
__________________
2011 E92 SG DCT ZCP
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 05:04 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant Colonel
171
Rep 1,530
Posts |
Just looked at mine. On 7th at 3K the car was running 76MPH.
__________________
2011 E92 JB/BL/DCT--->80K Miles
2015 F80 SS/SO/DCT?->28K Miles 2015 Porsche 911S |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 07:00 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant Colonel
24
Rep 1,604
Posts |
Can someone explain to me logically how the car can be "faster" after the 1200m/2000km service? This makes no sense apart from the fact that now that we can rev it higher we can achieve higher speed. The car is not intrinsically "faster" it's just that the slower speed were self-induced by the recommended BMW break-in period.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 07:47 PM | #16 | |
Major General
1904
Rep 5,678
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2020 X3 M40i | Black | Current DD
2020 C8 Corvette | Z51 | Torch Red ... built and waiting for delivery 2016 M2 | Long Beach Blue | 6MT 2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | DCT 2012 MB C63AMG | 2011 E92 M3 | 2010 E92 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 07:52 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
24
Rep 1,604
Posts |
I knew that. that does not make the car inherently faster. The only reason it goes faster is because the whole range of RPMs is accessed. There is nothing inherently in the 1200m service that makes the car faster.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 08:05 PM | #18 |
First Lieutenant
14
Rep 397
Posts |
__________________
09 E92 M3, Space Grey, Fox Red, DCT - Current
05 E46 M3 - Gone 02 330ci - Gone 99 Lexus GS400 - Gone |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 10:05 PM | #19 |
Major General
258
Rep 5,012
Posts |
The one I drove turned exactly 74 at 3K, so pretty much the same. And yes, you'd never use 6th on a track, so why it wasn't made taller? It'd be slower to pass, but simply downshift to 5th and problem solved. That's happen less than 1% of the time I'm on the highway, so it's a non-issue to most. Where it makes even less sense is on the DCTs, where 7th could have been a deep overdrive, leaving the first 6 ratios just like the manual.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 10:15 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant Colonel
30
Rep 1,789
Posts |
An overdrive gear would definitely help highway mileage. But then again, 7th gear is usable at around 50 or so in the city, so a tall 7th gear may have made city mileage even worse, so it might be all a wash.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|